From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH for-next 3/4] io_uring: clear REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED on hash removal
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:13:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02e48bb88d6f1480c94ac2924c43ad1fbd48e92a.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Instead of clearing REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED while arming a poll, unset the bit
when we're removing the entry from the table in io_poll_tw_hash_eject().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/poll.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index c1359d45a396..77b669b06046 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static void io_poll_tw_hash_eject(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
*/
io_tw_lock(ctx, locked);
hash_del(&req->hash_node);
+ req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
} else {
io_poll_req_delete(req, ctx);
}
@@ -617,9 +618,7 @@ int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
* apoll requests already grab the mutex to complete in the tw handler,
* so removal from the mutex-backed hash is free, use it by default.
*/
- if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)
- req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
- else
+ if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED))
req->flags |= REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
if (!def->pollin && !def->pollout)
@@ -880,8 +879,6 @@ int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED) &&
(req->ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL | IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER)))
req->flags |= REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
- else
- req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
ret = __io_arm_poll_handler(req, poll, &ipt, poll->events, issue_flags);
if (ret > 0) {
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 14:13 [PATCH for-next 0/4] poll locking fixes Pavel Begunkov
2022-07-07 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next 1/4] io_uring: don't miss setting REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL Pavel Begunkov
2022-07-07 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next 2/4] io_uring: don't race double poll setting REQ_F_ASYNC_DATA Pavel Begunkov
2022-07-07 14:13 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-07-07 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next 4/4] io_uring: consolidate hash_locked io-wq handling Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02e48bb88d6f1480c94ac2924c43ad1fbd48e92a.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox