From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>,
Dave Hansen <[email protected]>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,
Tony Luck <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
Jiri Hladky <[email protected]>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/mce/amd: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 06:27:33 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/3/22 6:20 AM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On 3/3/22 12:26 AM, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
>> Hi Ammar,
>
> Hi Yazen,
>
>> ...
>> The threshold interrupt handler uses this pointer. I think the goal here is to
>> set this pointer when the list is fully formed and clear this pointer before
>> making any changes to the list. Otherwise, the interrupt handler will operate
>> on incomplete data if an interrupt comes in the middle of these updates.
>>
>> The changes below should deal with memory leak issue while avoiding a race
>> with the threshold interrupt. What do you think?
>
> Thanks for taking a look into this. I didn't notice that before. The
> changes look good to me, extra improvements:
>
> 1) _mce_threshold_remove_device() should be static as we don't use it
> in another translation unit.
> 2) Minor cleanup, we don't need "goto out_err", just early return
> directly.
>
> I will fold them in...
>
Please review the patch below, if you think it looks good, I will
send this for the v5 series. I added your sign-off.
From cae3965734a67d11a5286c612dfddf52398defc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 05:07:38 +0700
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails
In mce_threshold_create_device(), when threshold_create_bank() fails,
the @bp will be leaked, because mce_threshold_remove_device() will
not free the @bp. It only frees the @bp when we've already written
the @bp to the @threshold_banks per-CPU variable, but at the point,
we haven't.
Fix this by extracting the cleanup part into a new static function
_mce_threshold_remove_device(), then use it from create and remove
device function.
Also, eliminate the "goto out_err". Just early return inside the loop
when we fail.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # v5.8+
Fixes: 6458de97fc15 ("x86/mce/amd: Straighten CPU hotplug path")
Co-authored-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 9f4b508886dd..ac7246a4de08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -1293,10 +1293,22 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(struct threshold_bank *bank)
kfree(bank);
}
+static void _mce_threshold_remove_device(struct threshold_bank **bp)
+{
+ unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
+
+ for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
+ if (bp[bank]) {
+ threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
+ bp[bank] = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ kfree(bp);
+}
+
int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct threshold_bank **bp = this_cpu_read(threshold_banks);
- unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
if (!bp)
return 0;
@@ -1307,13 +1319,7 @@ int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
*/
this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, NULL);
- for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
- if (bp[bank]) {
- threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
- bp[bank] = NULL;
- }
- }
- kfree(bp);
+ _mce_threshold_remove_device(bp);
return 0;
}
@@ -1350,15 +1356,14 @@ int mce_threshold_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
if (!(this_cpu_read(bank_map) & (1 << bank)))
continue;
err = threshold_create_bank(bp, cpu, bank);
- if (err)
- goto out_err;
+ if (err) {
+ _mce_threshold_remove_device(bp);
+ return err;
+ }
}
this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, bp);
if (thresholding_irq_en)
mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
return 0;
-out_err:
- mce_threshold_remove_device(cpu);
- return err;
}
--
Ammar Faizi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-02 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 9:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] Two x86 fixes Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01 9:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in `delay_loop()` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01 9:54 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 0:14 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01 11:33 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-03 0:06 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03 0:35 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 9:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/mce/amd: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails Ammar Faizi
2022-03-02 17:26 ` Yazen Ghannam
2022-03-02 23:20 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-02 23:27 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-03-03 1:58 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-03 2:07 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03 2:32 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03 2:51 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-07 0:27 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-09 20:55 ` Yazen Ghannam
2022-03-10 1:56 ` Ammar Faizi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox