From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B009FC433EF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357907AbiFVThh (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:37:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46164 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1357409AbiFVThg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:37:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE53F33EA7 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id l4so16977066pgh.13 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vLSA30lDdLkkDZbTdMy4zEFSQCe7LQsCuNdhdhUVnyc=; b=fQW3sLitv3yqKwsN0CNXkWDviWem6C1hxi+U9qy+SOHKKXJGHBat0NNdlUvxXvbAvq 9IUjlFZMndOYMzqbhmcUuR0IXdM7XQ5XLtI0iFqD+XK1HoLX2fuSJPy5d/gYpFyO7fY6 xZq/IWr8kBiAsAk5ulZDp1dn9Vnkux8oZ0Jsonc7JWyR3MbnXfc88UiLZMPEKzfAZ+7A Y6/ebrzPu2QqLLEUccMSfE638uTvx1g8TcJFpg5IoCv9HfYJHUJjrjaPP/7yn0BxiiWB LAZri9n4DdmvQGCZhHS5pcEkuz4hVfix9vEKvcJY3uc8gplytTDUJ6aLsH3ZL7IF2ziD 4Dnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vLSA30lDdLkkDZbTdMy4zEFSQCe7LQsCuNdhdhUVnyc=; b=baUdzSCOmTnieSX+G5CGej+gmBSPLpsGpTqu20NzixnzN0Z0DGlt2JcRnClSwcMoxJ 9G9sqOL7yFF6zXOgkXo+w1qiDpJBmMWipxnXmfZiUjsxLyMr+Fxhmk0EikyH327JtcBV QrIBUyIYthkrdsxXSGLHLBomqFoOk1iJ66gQALihrRGWFgLODkIZl6MZ0auF/8aOOMzV bnXNPc2VaOv+L0g20zfO2/jvRVxqx2Ie+1tp9EDNVvmIK8+8n7cRbIS8+looqpeH2q1e jCR76yIm8RMEYePcWldJPKgxMxzocoGIG+J6fvfcFg440Pvs/hzv/v66soQxoMwkvzQ0 CSzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8e0juwu4MlLSX/HPkJPDlrh47BQEq3arSJ/H+xCuUduzCU5ylI gAEk5KeeLC1Tyn5MlecSqfl/vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u6MpW/YCDLzqSgNzS2v8MbvkZDkPP/YeigD8Li9EZ7Wn53yh1D2KPX9MW9S3XrJQpMreg+JQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:9c4:0:b0:401:a7b6:ad18 with SMTP id 187-20020a6309c4000000b00401a7b6ad18mr4295807pgj.523.1655926654185; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y21-20020a056a00191500b005252867671esm4596595pfi.66.2022.06.22.12.37.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18355997-11e3-b511-f0cd-59c806fef6f1@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:37:32 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Content-Language: en-US To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Stefan Roesch , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org References: <20220616212221.2024518-1-shr@fb.com> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 6/22/22 1:35 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:41:14AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Top posting - are people fine with queueing this up at this point? Will >> need a bit of massaging for io_uring as certain things moved to another >> file, but it's really minor. I'd do a separate topic branch for this. > > I haven't had time to review this version, and I'm not likely to have > time before July 4th. I think Stefan addressed your previous concerns. But it's not like the merge window is around the corner, but would be nice to get some -next coverage in the mean time. So I don't think you being away should hold up that part, and there will still be time to take a look once you're back. -- Jens Axboe