public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
To: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>,
	Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>,
	Dave Hansen <[email protected]>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
	Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,
	Tony Luck <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
	Jiri Hladky <[email protected]>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/mce/amd: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails
Date: Thu,  3 Mar 2022 01:58:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 06:27:33 +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> +static void _mce_threshold_remove_device(struct threshold_bank **bp)
> +{
> +	unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
> +
> +	for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
> +		if (bp[bank]) {
> +			threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
> +			bp[bank] = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	kfree(bp);
> +}

hi sir, i think this can be improved again, we can avoid calling
this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) twice if we pass the numbanks as an
argument, plz review the changes below

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 9f4b508886dd..e492efab68a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -1293,10 +1293,23 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(struct threshold_bank *bank)
 	kfree(bank);
 }
 
+static void _mce_threshold_remove_device(struct threshold_bank **bp,
+					 unsigned int numbanks)
+{
+	unsigned int bank;
+
+	for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
+		if (bp[bank]) {
+			threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
+			bp[bank] = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+	kfree(bp);
+}
+
 int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct threshold_bank **bp = this_cpu_read(threshold_banks);
-	unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
 
 	if (!bp)
 		return 0;
@@ -1307,13 +1320,7 @@ int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
 	 */
 	this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, NULL);
 
-	for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
-		if (bp[bank]) {
-			threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
-			bp[bank] = NULL;
-		}
-	}
-	kfree(bp);
+	_mce_threshold_remove_device(bp, this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1350,15 +1357,14 @@ int mce_threshold_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
 		if (!(this_cpu_read(bank_map) & (1 << bank)))
 			continue;
 		err = threshold_create_bank(bp, cpu, bank);
-		if (err)
-			goto out_err;
+		if (err) {
+			_mce_threshold_remove_device(bp, numbanks);
+			return err;
+		}
 	}
 	this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, bp);
 
 	if (thresholding_irq_en)
 		mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
 	return 0;
-out_err:
-	mce_threshold_remove_device(cpu);
-	return err;
 }

-- Viro

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-03  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01  9:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] Two x86 fixes Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01  9:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in `delay_loop()` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01  9:54   ` David Laight
2022-03-03  0:14     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01 11:33   ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-03  0:06     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03  0:35     ` David Laight
2022-03-01  9:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/mce/amd: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails Ammar Faizi
2022-03-02 17:26   ` Yazen Ghannam
2022-03-02 23:20     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-02 23:27       ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03  1:58         ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan [this message]
2022-03-03  2:07           ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03  2:32             ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-03  2:51               ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-07  0:27               ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-09 20:55                 ` Yazen Ghannam
2022-03-10  1:56                   ` Ammar Faizi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220303015826.4176416-1-alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox