From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60])
	by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BAD7E2BC
	for <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from willy@localhost)
	by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 22MBRPIQ010612;
	Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:27:25 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:27:25 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
        Nugraha <richiisei@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Add dynamic memory allocator support for
 nolibc
Message-ID: <20220322112725.GC10306@1wt.eu>
References: <20220322102115.186179-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220322102115.186179-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

Hi Ammar,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:21:07PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the v2 of RFC to add dynamic memory allocator support for
> nolibc.

So overall, except for the syscall6 implementation whereI agree with
David that it would be better to always use the "push" variant, I'm
fine with the rest of the series.

thank you!
Willy