* [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG
@ 2022-03-23 15:39 Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-23 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov
Hi,
If we get a partial receive, we don't retry even if MSG_WAITALL is set.
Ensure that we retry for the remainder in that case.
The ordering of patches may look a bit odd here, but it's done this way
to make it easier to handle for the stable backport.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly
2022-03-23 15:39 [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-23 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-23 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov, Jens Axboe, stable
We currently don't attempt to get the full asked for length even if
MSG_WAITALL is set, if we get a partial receive. If we do see a partial
receive, then just note how many bytes we did and return -EAGAIN to
get it retried.
The iov is advanced appropriately for the vector based case, and we
manually bump the buffer and remainder for the non-vector case.
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Constantine Gavrilov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f41d91ce1fd0..2cd67b4ff924 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct io_sr_msg {
int msg_flags;
int bgid;
size_t len;
+ size_t done_io;
};
struct io_open {
@@ -5417,12 +5418,14 @@ static int io_recvmsg_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
if (req->ctx->compat)
sr->msg_flags |= MSG_CMSG_COMPAT;
#endif
+ sr->done_io = 0;
return 0;
}
static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_async_msghdr iomsg, *kmsg;
+ struct io_sr_msg *sr = &req->sr_msg;
struct socket *sock;
struct io_buffer *kbuf;
unsigned flags;
@@ -5465,6 +5468,10 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg);
if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
ret = -EINTR;
+ if (ret > 0 && flags & MSG_WAITALL) {
+ sr->done_io += ret;
+ return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg);
+ }
req_set_fail(req);
} else if ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (kmsg->msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC))) {
req_set_fail(req);
@@ -5474,6 +5481,10 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (kmsg->free_iov)
kfree(kmsg->free_iov);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ ret += sr->done_io;
+ else if (sr->done_io)
+ ret = sr->done_io;
__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, io_put_kbuf(req, issue_flags));
return 0;
}
@@ -5524,12 +5535,22 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return -EAGAIN;
if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
ret = -EINTR;
+ if (ret > 0 && flags & MSG_WAITALL) {
+ sr->len -= ret;
+ sr->buf += ret;
+ sr->done_io += ret;
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
req_set_fail(req);
} else if ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC))) {
out_free:
req_set_fail(req);
}
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ ret += sr->done_io;
+ else if (sr->done_io)
+ ret = sr->done_io;
__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, io_put_kbuf(req, issue_flags));
return 0;
}
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling
2022-03-23 15:39 [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-23 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-23 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov, Jens Axboe
If we need to continue doing this IO, then we don't want a potentially
selected buffer recycled. Add a flag for that.
Set this for recv/recvmsg if they do partial IO.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 2cd67b4ff924..5c6f4abbf294 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ enum {
REQ_F_SKIP_LINK_CQES_BIT,
REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL_BIT,
REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL_BIT,
+ REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO_BIT,
/* keep async read/write and isreg together and in order */
REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT,
REQ_F_ISREG_BIT,
@@ -845,6 +846,8 @@ enum {
REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL = BIT(REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL_BIT),
/* double poll may active */
REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL = BIT(REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL_BIT),
+ /* request has already done partial IO */
+ REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO = BIT(REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO_BIT),
};
struct async_poll {
@@ -1392,6 +1395,9 @@ static void io_kbuf_recycle(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)))
return;
+ /* don't recycle if we already did IO to this buffer */
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO)
+ return;
if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
@@ -5470,6 +5476,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = -EINTR;
if (ret > 0 && flags & MSG_WAITALL) {
sr->done_io += ret;
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg);
}
req_set_fail(req);
@@ -5539,6 +5546,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
sr->len -= ret;
sr->buf += ret;
sr->done_io += ret;
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
return -EAGAIN;
}
req_set_fail(req);
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-23 20:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-23 20:15 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 20:45 ` Constantine Gavrilov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2022-03-23 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov, stable
On 3/23/22 15:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We currently don't attempt to get the full asked for length even if
> MSG_WAITALL is set, if we get a partial receive. If we do see a partial
> receive, then just note how many bytes we did and return -EAGAIN to
> get it retried.
>
> The iov is advanced appropriately for the vector based case, and we
> manually bump the buffer and remainder for the non-vector case.
How datagrams work with MSG_WAITALL? I highly doubt it coalesces 2+
packets to satisfy the length requirement (e.g. because it may move
the address back into the userspace). I'm mainly afraid about
breaking io_uring users who are using the flag just to fail links
when there is not enough data in a packet.
--
Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2022-03-23 20:15 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 20:45 ` Constantine Gavrilov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-23 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov, stable
On 3/23/22 2:13 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 3/23/22 15:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> We currently don't attempt to get the full asked for length even if
>> MSG_WAITALL is set, if we get a partial receive. If we do see a partial
>> receive, then just note how many bytes we did and return -EAGAIN to
>> get it retried.
>>
>> The iov is advanced appropriately for the vector based case, and we
>> manually bump the buffer and remainder for the non-vector case.
>
> How datagrams work with MSG_WAITALL? I highly doubt it coalesces 2+
> packets to satisfy the length requirement (e.g. because it may move
> the address back into the userspace). I'm mainly afraid about
> breaking io_uring users who are using the flag just to fail links
> when there is not enough data in a packet.
Yes was thinking that too, nothing is final yet.. Need to write a
SOCK_STREAM test case.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-23 20:15 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-23 20:45 ` Constantine Gavrilov
2022-03-23 20:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Constantine Gavrilov @ 2022-03-23 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Begunkov; +Cc: Jens Axboe, io-uring, stable
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:14 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 3/23/22 15:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > We currently don't attempt to get the full asked for length even if
> > MSG_WAITALL is set, if we get a partial receive. If we do see a partial
> > receive, then just note how many bytes we did and return -EAGAIN to
> > get it retried.
> >
> > The iov is advanced appropriately for the vector based case, and we
> > manually bump the buffer and remainder for the non-vector case.
>
> How datagrams work with MSG_WAITALL? I highly doubt it coalesces 2+
> packets to satisfy the length requirement (e.g. because it may move
> the address back into the userspace). I'm mainly afraid about
> breaking io_uring users who are using the flag just to fail links
> when there is not enough data in a packet.
>
> --
> Pavel Begunkov
Pavel:
Datagrams have message boundaries and the MSG_WAITALL flag does not
make sense there. I believe it is ignored by receive code on daragram
sockets. MSG_WAITALL makes sends only on stream sockets, like TCP. The
manual page says "This flag has no effect for datagram sockets.".
--
----------------------------------------
Constantine Gavrilov
Storage Architect
Master Inventor
Tel-Aviv IBM Storage Lab
1 Azrieli Center, Tel-Aviv
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly
2022-03-23 20:45 ` Constantine Gavrilov
@ 2022-03-23 20:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2022-03-23 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Constantine Gavrilov; +Cc: Jens Axboe, io-uring, stable
On 3/23/22 20:45, Constantine Gavrilov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:14 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/23/22 15:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> We currently don't attempt to get the full asked for length even if
>>> MSG_WAITALL is set, if we get a partial receive. If we do see a partial
>>> receive, then just note how many bytes we did and return -EAGAIN to
>>> get it retried.
>>>
>>> The iov is advanced appropriately for the vector based case, and we
>>> manually bump the buffer and remainder for the non-vector case.
>>
>> How datagrams work with MSG_WAITALL? I highly doubt it coalesces 2+
>> packets to satisfy the length requirement (e.g. because it may move
>> the address back into the userspace). I'm mainly afraid about
>> breaking io_uring users who are using the flag just to fail links
>> when there is not enough data in a packet.
>>
>> --
>> Pavel Begunkov
>
> Pavel:
>
> Datagrams have message boundaries and the MSG_WAITALL flag does not
> make sense there. I believe it is ignored by receive code on daragram
> sockets. MSG_WAITALL makes sends only on stream sockets, like TCP. The
> manual page says "This flag has no effect for datagram sockets.".
Missed the line this in mans, thanks, and it's exactly as expected.
The problem is on the io_uring side where with the patch it might
blindly do a second call into the network stack consuming 2+ packets.
--
Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling
2022-03-23 22:41 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-23 22:41 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-23 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: constantine.gavrilov, Jens Axboe
If we need to continue doing this IO, then we don't want a potentially
selected buffer recycled. Add a flag for that.
Set this for recv/recvmsg if they do partial IO.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index a70de170aea1..88556e654c5a 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ enum {
REQ_F_SKIP_LINK_CQES_BIT,
REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL_BIT,
REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL_BIT,
+ REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO_BIT,
/* keep async read/write and isreg together and in order */
REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT,
REQ_F_ISREG_BIT,
@@ -845,6 +846,8 @@ enum {
REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL = BIT(REQ_F_SINGLE_POLL_BIT),
/* double poll may active */
REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL = BIT(REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL_BIT),
+ /* request has already done partial IO */
+ REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO = BIT(REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO_BIT),
};
struct async_poll {
@@ -1392,6 +1395,9 @@ static void io_kbuf_recycle(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)))
return;
+ /* don't recycle if we already did IO to this buffer */
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO)
+ return;
if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
@@ -5477,6 +5483,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = -EINTR;
if (ret > 0 && io_net_retry(sock, flags)) {
sr->done_io += ret;
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg);
}
req_set_fail(req);
@@ -5546,6 +5553,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
sr->len -= ret;
sr->buf += ret;
sr->done_io += ret;
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
return -EAGAIN;
}
req_set_fail(req);
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-23 22:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-23 15:39 [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-23 20:15 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 20:45 ` Constantine Gavrilov
2022-03-23 20:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-23 22:41 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Fix MSG_WAITALL for IORING_OP_RECV/RECVMSG Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add flag for disabling provided buffer recycling Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox