public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>,
	Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
	Dave Hansen <[email protected]>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
	Tony Luck <[email protected]>,
	Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	Stable Kernel <[email protected]>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	x86 Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:47:05 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

In mce_threshold_create_device(), if threshold_create_bank() fails, the
@bp will be leaked, because the call to mce_threshold_remove_device()
will not free the @bp. mce_threshold_remove_device() frees
@threshold_banks. At that point, the @bp has not been written to
@threshold_banks, @threshold_banks is NULL, so the call is just a nop.

Fix this by extracting the cleanup part into a new static function
__threshold_remove_device(), then call it from create/remove device
functions.

Also, eliminate the "goto out_err", just early return inside the loop
if the creation fails.

Cc: [email protected] # v5.8+
Fixes: 6458de97fc15 ("x86/mce/amd: Straighten CPU hotplug path")
Co-developed-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
---

   v6:
     - Change the helper function name to __threshold_remove_device().

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 1940d305db1c..d293ae088d6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -1294,10 +1294,23 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(struct threshold_bank *bank)
 	kfree(bank);
 }
 
+static void __threshold_remove_device(struct threshold_bank **bp,
+				       unsigned int numbanks)
+{
+	unsigned int bank;
+
+	for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
+		if (bp[bank]) {
+			threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
+			bp[bank] = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+	kfree(bp);
+}
+
 int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct threshold_bank **bp = this_cpu_read(threshold_banks);
-	unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
 
 	if (!bp)
 		return 0;
@@ -1308,13 +1321,7 @@ int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
 	 */
 	this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, NULL);
 
-	for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
-		if (bp[bank]) {
-			threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
-			bp[bank] = NULL;
-		}
-	}
-	kfree(bp);
+	__threshold_remove_device(bp, this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1351,15 +1358,14 @@ int mce_threshold_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
 		if (!(this_cpu_read(bank_map) & (1 << bank)))
 			continue;
 		err = threshold_create_bank(bp, cpu, bank);
-		if (err)
-			goto out_err;
+		if (err) {
+			__threshold_remove_device(bp, numbanks);
+			return err;
+		}
 	}
 	this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, bp);
 
 	if (thresholding_irq_en)
 		mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
 	return 0;
-out_err:
-	mce_threshold_remove_device(cpu);
-	return err;
 }
-- 
Ammar Faizi


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 10:47 [PATCH v6 0/2] Two x86 fixes Ammar Faizi
2022-03-29 10:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in `delay_loop()` Ammar Faizi
2022-04-01 17:42   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-02  5:15     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-04-03 16:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-03 17:11     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-04-03 17:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-05 20:50   ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in delay_loop() tip-bot2 for Ammar Faizi
2022-03-29 10:47 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-04-03 17:03   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-03 17:43     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-04-03 17:45       ` Ammar Faizi
2022-04-03 18:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-05 20:56   ` [tip: ras/core] x86/MCE/AMD: Fix memory leak when threshold_create_bank() fails tip-bot2 for Ammar Faizi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox