From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 06/18] xfs: add iomap async buffered write support
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:54:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:43:23AM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This adds the async buffered write support to the iomap layer of XFS. If
> a lock cannot be acquired or additional reads need to be performed, the
> request will return -EAGAIN in case this is an async buffered write request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index e552ce541ec2..80b6c48e88af 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -881,18 +881,28 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> bool eof = false, cow_eof = false, shared = false;
> int allocfork = XFS_DATA_FORK;
> int error = 0;
> + bool no_wait = (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT);
>
> if (xfs_is_shutdown(mp))
> return -EIO;
>
> /* we can't use delayed allocations when using extent size hints */
> - if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip))
> + if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> + if (no_wait)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
> flags, iomap, srcmap);
Why can't we do IOMAP_NOWAIT allocation here?
xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() supports IOMAP_NOWAIT semantics just
fine - that's what the direct IO path uses...
> + }
>
> ASSERT(!XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip));
>
> - xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> + if (no_wait) {
> + if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + } else {
> + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> + }
handled by xfs_ilock_for_iomap().
>
> if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_ifork_has_extents(&ip->i_df)) ||
> XFS_TEST_ERROR(false, mp, XFS_ERRTAG_BMAPIFORMAT)) {
> @@ -902,6 +912,11 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>
> XFS_STATS_INC(mp, xs_blk_mapw);
>
> + if (no_wait && xfs_need_iread_extents(XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK))) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
Also handled by xfs_ilock_for_iomap().
> error = xfs_iread_extents(NULL, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
> @@ -933,6 +948,10 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip)) {
> if (!ip->i_cowfp) {
> ASSERT(!xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip));
> + if (no_wait) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> xfs_ifork_init_cow(ip);
> }
Also handled by xfs_ilock_for_iomap().
> cow_eof = !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, offset_fsb,
> @@ -956,6 +975,11 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> goto found_imap;
> }
>
> + if (no_wait) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
Won't get here because this is COW path, and xfs_ilock_for_iomap()
handles returning -EAGAIN for that case.
> xfs_trim_extent(&imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb);
>
> /* Trim the mapping to the nearest shared extent boundary. */
> @@ -993,6 +1017,11 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> allocfork = XFS_COW_FORK;
> }
>
> + if (no_wait) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
Why? Delayed allocation doesn't block...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 17:43 [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/18] block: add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/18] mm: add FGP_ATOMIC flag to __filemap_get_folio() Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-04-28 19:54 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/18] iomap: add iomap_page_create_gfp to allocate iomap_pages Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/18] iomap: use iomap_page_create_gfp() in __iomap_write_begin Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/18] iomap: add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/18] xfs: add iomap " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:54 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-04-28 20:03 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/18] fs: split off need_remove_file_privs() do_remove_file_privs() Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/18] fs: split off need_file_update_time and do_file_update_time Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/18] fs: add pending file update time flag Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] xfs: Enable async write file modification handling Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 12:07 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/18] xfs: add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-04-28 19:58 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-28 21:54 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-05-09 19:32 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/18] io_uring: add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/18] io_uring: add tracepoint for short writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/18] sched: add new fields to task_struct Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/18] mm: support write throttling for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-28 17:47 ` Jan Kara
2022-04-28 20:16 ` Stefan Roesch
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-05-11 10:38 ` Jan Kara
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/18] iomap: User " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/18] io_uring: support write " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/18] xfs: enable async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox