From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89C9C433EF for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 07:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345519AbiEDHpf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 03:45:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235940AbiEDHpd (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 03:45:33 -0400 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97531277C; Wed, 4 May 2022 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KtTL911z7z4xbN; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:41:53 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1651650113; bh=Ijp0uFTI8NoLOKpl5zQz9vp/Fj/DnqWjekXZnVDfCIk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nsAPtSfEv+6RgSsFtTNIcAWdjsHHvucECXRyN07Wd8Y595Jh65nAgGLJMWXdbEKJb oUekEUoG02VI8cH5ljGOxlKy05QO+UW9MQ7iyrpBrY81nKeftMUEuytGVfNsfGkCwY e2EZCfd7+XiDt1I4g6O4tmClZmphyYIokBDVcT+opcCEejsl1HOvtI8noyq1woBPLo ihfmpMRpT/t33N/SYGQMjzkmZmJ53g0NGqvDDIzoAauKcC/6PBAKikExHP/iz59YNr QPbhcMxjC/vAUEIbGSWnlr2fc925Jk/uqV1ft6bXF6cB/sHEy8NfIA4cNQ36IbxMNd xX3aZXyLReFxw== Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 17:41:51 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Alexandre TORGUE Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the stm32 tree Message-ID: <20220504174151.3bfeeaf8@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20220504072746.0f59f2d9@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/eoaP/2nwrE3bn.DZtC0Xg8G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/eoaP/2nwrE3bn.DZtC0Xg8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alexandre, On Wed, 4 May 2022 07:28:53 +0000 Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > > Actually this patch has been already merged in Rob tree. I just > cherry-pick it in my tree to avoid a merge conflict later for other > maintainers. So I didn't add my "Signed-off-by". =20 You should add a SOB for every patch you add to your published tree. That includes cherry-picked commits from other trees. By the way, most maintainers (and Linus and I) are pretty adept at sorting out merge conflicts (unless they are really complex, or course, in which case you should probably have created a branch in one fo the trees containing the conflicting commits from that tree and then merge that branch into the both trees - and, of course, noted what is happening in the merge commits). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/eoaP/2nwrE3bn.DZtC0Xg8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmJyLj8ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxXQggAi/VqXL/k3CwCgMtPj+gO9K8aL6MTpiTBZnUa1D9JnqKGAj/+LQa7YIVZ l86bblf3ViZEVpcp9AYVmtWZFo5aVRERPjkp2ndQcHX75oWXkWVv3+rHEMJGbfOl cDeChMI5ln9yT9bobE0AJa1bbmqxgNjmlZvZntPB6Y9YJZ83eIOVUPY2FMRiM2iU DIA8Qxvj/KJgxYRh4ZQ3ORjzunWQm/Rj4NFHXWOiec/8RVOJfXkgGSihNakoFgTx o+00C4SMvuoZgFBUKnsvx/OFVlUscMivbT94glHkLblEFRe08mSZaMiLbj3SH7w2 5mBrKtIuj8Eb6ktW9ETQFH0KSZd28Q== =1utS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eoaP/2nwrE3bn.DZtC0Xg8G--