* Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the stm32 tree
[not found] ` <AS8PR10MB4712B3354DACBB8A4F8309C9EEC39@AS8PR10MB4712.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
@ 2022-05-04 7:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-05-04 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre TORGUE; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
Hi Alexandre,
On Wed, 4 May 2022 07:28:53 +0000 Alexandre TORGUE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Actually this patch has been already merged in Rob tree. I just
> cherry-pick it in my tree to avoid a merge conflict later for other
> maintainers. So I didn't add my "Signed-off-by".
You should add a SOB for every patch you add to your published tree.
That includes cherry-picked commits from other trees.
By the way, most maintainers (and Linus and I) are pretty adept at
sorting out merge conflicts (unless they are really complex, or course,
in which case you should probably have created a branch in one fo the
trees containing the conflicting commits from that tree and then merge
that branch into the both trees - and, of course, noted what is
happening in the merge commits).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread