From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAE4C433F5 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 23:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232201AbiEUXN6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 19:13:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231722AbiEUXN5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 19:13:57 -0400 Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.246]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20873CFE8; Sat, 21 May 2022 16:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-181-2-147.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.181.2.147]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF285345CF; Sun, 22 May 2022 09:13:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1nsYIA-00Eoqu-QQ; Sun, 22 May 2022 09:13:50 +1000 Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 09:13:50 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Christian Brauner Cc: Zorro Lang , fstests , Eryu Guan , Amir Goldstein , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] rename & split tests Message-ID: <20220521231350.GY2306852@dread.disaster.area> References: <20220512165250.450989-1-brauner@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220512165250.450989-1-brauner@kernel.org> X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=VuxAv86n c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=62897232 a=ivVLWpVy4j68lT4lJFbQgw==:117 a=ivVLWpVy4j68lT4lJFbQgw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=oZkIemNP1mAA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=7-415B0cAAAA:8 a=3bHb4aL3uS5y75ZLPDYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=AjGcO6oz07-iQ99wixmX:22 a=biEYGPWJfzWAr4FL6Ov7:22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org [cc io_uring] On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > From: "Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" > > Hey everyone, > > Please note that this patch series contains patches that will be > rejected by the fstests mailing list because of the amount of changes > they contain. So tools like b4 will not be able to find the whole patch > series on a mailing list. In case it's helpful I've added the > "fstests.vfstest.for-next" tag which can be pulled. Otherwise it's > possible to simply use the patch series as it appears in your inbox. > > All vfstests pass: [...] > #### xfs #### > ubuntu@imp1-vm:~/src/git/xfstests$ sudo ./check -g idmapped > FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 imp1-vm 5.18.0-rc4-fs-mnt-hold-writers-8a2e2350494f #107 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon May 9 12:12:34 UTC 2022 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f /dev/sda4 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch > > generic/633 58s ... 58s > generic/644 62s ... 60s > generic/645 161s ... 161s > generic/656 62s ... 63s > xfs/152 133s ... 133s > xfs/153 94s ... 92s > Ran: generic/633 generic/644 generic/645 generic/656 xfs/152 xfs/153 > Passed all 6 tests I'm not sure if it's this series that has introduced a test bug or triggered a latent issue in the kernel, but I've started seeing generic/633 throw audit subsystem warnings on a single test machine as of late Friday: [ 7285.015888] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2147118 at kernel/auditsc.c:2035 __audit_syscall_entry+0x113/0x140 [ 7285.019973] Modules linked in: [ 7285.021281] CPU: 3 PID: 2147118 Comm: vfstest Not tainted 5.18.0-rc7-dgc+ #1250 [ 7285.024341] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 7285.027782] RIP: 0010:__audit_syscall_entry+0x113/0x140 [ 7285.029923] Code: 24 e8 c1 6b ff ff 48 8b 34 24 85 c0 48 8b 54 24 08 48 8b 4c 24 10 4c 8b 44 24 18 0f 84 72 ff ff ff 48 83 c4 20 5b 5d 41 5c c3 <0f> 0b 85 c0 75 14 48 83 c4 20 48 c7 c7 70 45 7f 82 5b 5d 41 5c e9 [ 7285.037563] RSP: 0018:ffffc900012f7ed0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 7285.039748] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880aaf18800 RCX: 000000000000003c [ 7285.043126] RDX: 00000000000000e7 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff888102104f00 [ 7285.046120] RBP: 00000000000000e7 R08: fffffffffffffe2c R09: 0000000000000002 [ 7285.049108] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 7285.052058] R13: ffffc900012f7f58 R14: 00000000000000e7 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 7285.055030] FS: 00007f7906d6c740(0000) GS:ffff88813bd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7285.058396] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7285.060788] CR2: 00007f3ffa7e9bb8 CR3: 000000010bb00000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 7285.063735] Call Trace: [ 7285.064796] [ 7285.065759] syscall_trace_enter.constprop.0+0x122/0x1a0 [ 7285.067978] do_syscall_64+0x16/0x80 [ 7285.069497] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 7285.071590] RIP: 0033:0x7f7906e35f49 [ 7285.073118] Code: 00 4c 8b 05 29 6f 10 00 be e7 00 00 00 ba 3c 00 00 00 eb 12 0f 1f 44 00 00 89 d0 0f 05 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1c f4 89 f0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 76 e7 f7 d8 64 41 89 00 eb df 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 [ 7285.078021] RSP: 002b:00007ffeee52db88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 [ 7285.079995] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7906f39920 RCX: 00007f7906e35f49 [ 7285.081869] RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 7285.083729] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffffffffff88 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 7285.085594] R10: fffffffffffffe2c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f7906f39920 [ 7285.087457] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f7906f3ee28 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 7285.089320] [ 7285.089949] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 7285.091182] audit_panic: 22 callbacks suppressed [ 7285.091185] audit: unrecoverable error in audit_syscall_entry() Adn faddr_to_line tells me it is this: void __audit_syscall_entry(int major, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4) { struct audit_context *context = audit_context(); enum audit_state state; if (!audit_enabled || !context) return; >>>>>> WARN_ON(context->context != AUDIT_CTX_UNUSED); <<<<<< WARN_ON(context->name_count); if (context->context != AUDIT_CTX_UNUSED || context->name_count) { audit_panic("unrecoverable error in audit_syscall_entry()"); return; } ..... I have no clue how the audit subsystem works, I don't even know how to enable it, and I've never seen audit messages on the console of this test machine. I have other test machines that have audit enabled, and they do not dump warnings like this - the only thing I see in the logs for those machines is this: run xfstest generic/633 process 'vfstest' launched '/dev/fd/4/file1' with NULL argv: empty string added XFS (pmem0): Unmounting Filesystem XFS (pmem0): Mounting V5 Filesystem XFS (pmem0): Ending clean mount run xfstest generic/634 That's waht I was seeing from this test machine earlier in the week, too - I've been running 5.18-rc7 as the base kernel all week - so I'm not sure ..... Oooooohhhh. /* The per-task audit context. */ struct audit_context { int dummy; /* must be the first element */ enum { AUDIT_CTX_UNUSED, /* audit_context is currently unused */ AUDIT_CTX_SYSCALL, /* in use by syscall */ AUDIT_CTX_URING, /* in use by io_uring */ } context; .... And that reminded me of something. I commented on #xfs on Friday afternoon: [20/5/22 15:04] so of the 3.5 hours run time on the machine that jsut completed, it looks like about a dozen tests are responsible for an hour of that runtime... [20/5/22 15:05] but it was a clean run with no failures in 1055 tests run. [20/5/22 15:06] But there's some WTFs like this in it: [20/5/22 15:06] generic/678 [not run] kernel does not support IO_URING [20/5/22 15:08] yet the same kernel on a different machine: [20/5/22 15:08] generic/678 11s ... 3s [20/5/22 15:08] and they have the same userspace, too.... Yeah, the machine that complained about "kernel does not support IO_URING" is the one that is throwing these warnings now. It wasn't that the kernel didn't support io-uring, it was that the machine was missing the liburing-dev library. I installed it and rebuilt fstests. These audit failures co-incide with the first test runs with io-uring enabled. And vfstest uses io_uring if fstests enables it. Hence this now smells like a pre-existing issue - either a test bug or an io_uring task audit context leak. Anyone got any ideas? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com