From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7615C433EF for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 21:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230356AbiEWVEz (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 17:04:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229570AbiEWVEw (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 17:04:52 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3811E72225 for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 24NL4h5j027319; Mon, 23 May 2022 23:04:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 23:04:43 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Team Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc changes for v5.19 Message-ID: <20220523210443.GD25949@1wt.eu> References: <20220520182428.GA3791250@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20220523195605.GA13032@1wt.eu> <20220523202336.GB13032@1wt.eu> <20220523205043.GA25949@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220523205043.GA25949@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 10:50:43PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 01:30:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 1:23 PM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > > So I've figured it again. When you run: > > > > > > make tools/help > > > > > > you get the help of tools/ commands, [..] > > > > You speak the words, but you don't actually look at what it does. > > > > Try it. > > Why are you saying this ? I've figured the commands by trying > each of them. I think I found it: make -C tools/ _ and: make tools/_ work the same on all commands but actually: make -C tools/ nolibc_headers fails while: make tools/nolibc_headers works. I've essentially used the latter by simplicity without noticing that it doesn't work as suggested with _install, and I guess that's what you got. I'll check why it's like this and will propose a fix. Thanks, Willy