public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Gilang Fachrezy <[email protected]>,
	Muhammad Rizki <[email protected]>,
	VNLX Kernel Department <[email protected]>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	io-uring Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH liburing v1 4/8] test/ring-leak: Remove a "break" statement in a "for loop"
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:49:56 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Clang says:

  ring-leak.c:235:21: warning: loop will run at most once \
  (loop increment never executed) [-Wunreachable-code-loop-increment]
          for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
                             ^~~

This "break" statement makes the "for loop" meaningless. Remove it. We
are supposed to run the test function with 2 different arguments using
this "for loop".

Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
---
 test/ring-leak.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/ring-leak.c b/test/ring-leak.c
index f2ba74f..97b5a3f 100644
--- a/test/ring-leak.c
+++ b/test/ring-leak.c
@@ -234,21 +234,20 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 		bool update = !!(i & 1);
 
 		ret = test_scm_cycles(update);
 		if (ret) {
 			fprintf(stderr, "test_scm_cycles() failed %i\n",
 				update);
 			return 1;
 		}
-		break;
 	}
 
 	if (socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, sp) != 0) {
 		perror("Failed to create Unix-domain socket pair\n");
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	ring_fd = get_ring_fd();
 	if (ring_fd < 0)
 		return 1;
-- 
Ammar Faizi


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-19 15:49 [PATCH liburing v1 0/8] liburing updates Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 1/8] ffi: Add SPDX-License-Idetifier Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 2/8] Makefile: Add a '+' char to silence a Makefile warning Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 3/8] tests: Fix `-Wstrict-prototypes` warnings from Clang Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 5/8] tests: Fix clang `-Wunreachable-code` warning Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 6/8] tests: Declare internal variables as static Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:49 ` [PATCH liburing v1 7/8] github: Add more extra flags for clang build Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 15:50 ` [PATCH liburing v1 8/8] CHANGELOG: Update the CHANGELOG file Ammar Faizi
2022-12-19 17:00 ` [PATCH liburing v1 0/8] liburing updates Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox