From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.230.80] (unknown [182.2.72.138]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97D27804D1; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:12:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1662199952; bh=iRJowFNt1mBZWBAOTguiw+1ZMV+RFlNoD4oB46iFkzo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=RMzuiru1nxWBPAeFxxfhLj8/NXl76c3naU3vcuoy9S7snci7evt2DIuHPYz7xzpYr HzTOWoY59FvIWr77wV3QCBcMqJsCPGbNarYs24ENtA36unR8UpttHsfc7pa+hsR4F1 AzaDbmAJDv7e3/YIrcT0DPqLrHVFg1OTcftJNZIssmwhtK9w7Y3njRkylI9efYH6bB jne7Ft750goK31UXubHnzV/yNoybUJOMZ7fm+h2vVTAJ4aZO0dzz7ycl7jEyJj5RX9 mNOy/0m8ig4IcPqpTViIQ41qZBSWacjkYpaOrFSKobuMF9uJ2YLW/vAIcPfzm2lO81 5RxXILuX/ifiA== Message-ID: <2022a589-a56f-3eaf-5257-086cb3e4ae31@gnuweeb.org> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 17:12:27 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] New Discord bot and full refactor scripts Content-Language: en-US To: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan Cc: Muhammad Rizki , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20220827030236.1094-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <51f80c60-d2a6-2b41-f27a-f75cd212a1f7@gnuweeb.org> From: Ammar Faizi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 9/3/22 5:06 PM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 4:58 PM Ammar Faizi wrote: >> On 9/3/22 4:56 PM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 8:28 AM Ammar Faizi wrote: >>>> On 8/27/22 10:02 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: >>>>> Muhammad Rizki (3): >>>>> Move the Telegram bot source code >>>>> First release Discord bot >>>>> Full refactor bot scripts >>>> >>>> Please split these into smaller manageable-reviewable pieces. >>>> I simply can't review it. Each patch should only do one thing. >>> >>> you may want to impose stricter standards for this workflow, otherwise >>> it's not going to be productive, especially Rizki isn't that >>> experienced with this emailed patchset procedure. You should also >>> consider giving him a pay rise if you do more a complex workflow like >>> this >> >> We certainly can do that. But let's see how this is going to be done >> in the next revision. If it's starting to get better, I will reconsider. > > ic ic, > > i also want to file a complaint, you didn't give enough attention to > him. This makes the work boring, thus the result isn't good I admit that and I am sorry. I was too enjoying other works previously and this series dropped off my radar. I will give more attention and proper review start from now on. Thanks for the feedback! -- Ammar Faizi