From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=kmZivN56; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=xLP6jEW0; dkim-atps=neutral Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=195.135.220.28; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=dsterba@suse.cz; receiver= Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FABF245934 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:54:28 +0700 (WIB) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD26E219C0; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:54:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1682434465; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8UuFcKLSvjtYjYDwVvs5uj1rPCVVtEm4R1j3vEbQGPE=; b=kmZivN56VWhkAPuk6RI43aw6i4XmJM9erfhQbymS+/EbEdNhU8HqjDCFKA9XdtQW07nO6s WY33pVF99//+tyKi0JvoZJ2H0E7UKprIB3WZ6lg6tIy4SbXDNhOaH/iaWZSG8BJnw8GUoE 2OEPB11aQ6Q/YEm8OiyroHcOxCN2SqQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1682434465; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8UuFcKLSvjtYjYDwVvs5uj1rPCVVtEm4R1j3vEbQGPE=; b=xLP6jEW0fnVszwK8Zw84MmrlwfcKFJP/ScrtFjbvzvr/+PMyeo2ScdsvnTVDjnhNvFJeow vCz8SKN/S2Te5rCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8747C138E3; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id nKlbIKHpR2SHSQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:54:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:54:12 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Sterba , Qu Wenruo , Josef Bacik , Memet , Linux Btrfs Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , GNU/Weeb Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.3 Message-ID: <20230425145412.GC19619@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <4b35f3a4-9972-b7f0-287f-165a817c0f73@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4b35f3a4-9972-b7f0-287f-165a817c0f73@gnuweeb.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) List-Id: On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 09:27:30AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote: > On 2/21/23 4:02 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:26 AM David Sterba wrote: > >> Other: > >> > >> - locally enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized after fixing all warnings > > > > I've pulled this, but I strongly suspect this change will get reverted. > > > > I bet neither you nor linux-next is testing even _remotely_ a big > > chunk of the different compiler versions that are out there, and the > > reason flags like '-Wmaybe-uninitialized' get undone is because some > > random compiler version on some random config and target archiecture > > gives completely nonsensical warnings for odd reasons. > > > > But hey, maybe the btrfs code is special. > > Maybe it's too late for 6.3. So please fix this in 6.4 and backport it to > 6.3 stable. If someone fixes it, kindly add: Fix for this warning is in 6.4 pull request, there's no CC:stable tag but we can ask to add it once the code lands in master.