From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=bNS+TekK; dkim-atps=neutral Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=srs0=wjcp=bh=paulmck-thinkpad-p17-gen-1.home=paulmck@kernel.org; receiver= Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3A92492E7 for ; Thu, 18 May 2023 21:55:25 +0700 (WIB) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F195264FCF; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 633CFC4339B; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:55:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1684421723; bh=Ks2BcB2HxSbBY7mPbJIjN33LPo2/4OOsJWgK+op14zY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bNS+TekKDdkvsHrj3RcZ9hgMDDRdzgoHGGrErRzo9MA2Zow+POuD6WovfiWP2Jgsp PQUbyODWIX8J72tFeD7CV80O0qTjvIPGu2Gzz8mQ9EUiWTt/DaM86rHWlcaEzhzC2G GnjfrAlJl6ebtRnFELp9cPQdUPCmI2H82de93QX4C38jLPyGuOgO7wFMbg3V+C2tOZ 37Vof3pSyINO9knyDddsfeZ41kWd6UbNJ0+xCY0CYme0lBQr4BPlMSJmLZWR1HVwX2 LeTPM5goZ+1HPI5+rLZXOS3ouLPB3F4j3N6DHbcAz7Bzt3WQ04rdPIhkRS+32U0REI YH5IRbqHugzmA== Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 159FBCE04B0; Thu, 18 May 2023 07:55:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org, kernel-team@meta.com, w@lwt.eu, Willy Tarreau , =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , "Paul E . McKenney" Subject: [PATCH v2 nolibc 02/15] tools/nolibc: tests: fix build on non-c99 compliant compilers Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 07:55:08 -0700 Message-Id: <20230518145521.3806117-2-paulmck@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <4817a4dc-69e6-4937-84d5-f2f630ff646c@paulmck-laptop> References: <4817a4dc-69e6-4937-84d5-f2f630ff646c@paulmck-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: From: Willy Tarreau Commit 9735716830f2 ("tools/nolibc: tests: add test for -fstack-protector") brought a declaration inside the initialization statement of a for loop, which breaks the build on compilers that do not default to c99 compatibility, making it more difficult to validate that the lib still builds on such compilers. The fix is trivial, so let's move the declaration to the variables block of the function instead. No backport is needed. Cc: Thomas Weißschuh Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 47013b78972e..6f2f109569a3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -671,8 +671,9 @@ static int smash_stack(void) { char buf[100]; volatile char *ptr = buf; + size_t i; - for (size_t i = 0; i < 200; i++) + for (i = 0; i < 200; i++) ptr[i] = 'P'; return 1; -- 2.40.1