From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Authentication-Results: server-vie001.gnuweeb.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=Xji4qPCu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B13A3127C32; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: server-vie001.gnuweeb.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=172.234.252.31; helo=sea.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver= Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364AE3127C26 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832EB43669; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8B34C4CEF0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754437669; bh=T+TQB9L6nkRD5oCLbLR5cryrKU8+F1aWEUgdRNPnQw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xji4qPCu3qnlfabkVpSBksej6fDAS4kX5md1OfqcrAiLJdQnDqqZsumjw/OXZpxFz RGtoGyJFbL1xwnKB4fTMEk3iPS2cocKvhkQXRoAb5PIzkz2OyEejSgeZg2lG+fhgVC GR/5gkdcPjkEUESPItt0CBA+GkO2uXi/oHK/kpLR8lVvPDtU3BY1LRT8J/M5tgyscN Lt34wXvZJ9zr0gtmdIVye5BtWnmqv6k6Fsv1vtpCUxAkdpYUOBYIhgGtPai6JlIYqp bU3VjiypbFoDw2FgOuX31rb1MehFi+iAjqno/GHnqCKzEUGDQdXWfOOw6k83U5DMwC IYM5zyaXSgNTA== Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:47:47 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Linus Torvalds , Ammar Faizi Cc: Simon Horman , Oliver Neukum , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Netdev Mailing List , Linux USB Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Armando Budianto , gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, John Ernberg Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: usbnet: Fix the wrong netif_carrier_on() call placement Message-ID: <20250805164747.40e63f6d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250801190310.58443-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> <20250804100050.GQ8494@horms.kernel.org> <20250805202848.GC61519@horms.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 01:40:37 +0300 Linus Torvalds wrote: > So my gut feel is that the > > if (test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags)) > netif_carrier_on(dev->net); > > should actually be done outside that if-statement entirely, because it > literally ends up changing the thing that if-statement is testing. Right. I think it should be before the if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev->net)) Ammar, could you retest and repost that, since we haven't heard from John?