From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server-vie001.gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=new2025; t=1757227414;
	bh=Z9xXgUj1v1eIbmY/pdUJSTMf+1PVp2p9YVTh79jk1Wo=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:In-Reply-To:X-Gw-Outgoing-Server-Hash:X-Gw-Message-ID:
	 X-Gw-PM-Hash:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:
	 In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:
	 User-Agent:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=oyIUrbruzKU9zjBZPf+4Ln5Ac2A4J2Qx6ooFogIQNveNfki7o2FmDVSi6OkTGOC1T
	 QsHDNYRUqTFaRScaU9m2mIBLZSSt1n8iUMbdbqk0kERmNHutLPDuNuyhio3JWx8ULc
	 M6ZqMlJWQjGxJHBYfltqP1UilTcOJrEzX07jkTYf4+VKiFdiBaU5t0VA50Qed2u1nZ
	 VHPOG5Tc4mlFOFnopIElJIoqduFyoUJv9SXUcCkzHujWxf6wHmHg0hG5wV1+LPHPtC
	 5KuI7xdkAqPD6fOd0LnB+dEqgKPuKwVJ1cUdwU2EYGzlkiJcEpwkQMN6pzNy40gGaj
	 Xnw8GQtnRjhRA==
Received: from linux.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.253.126.215])
	by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2772231279D5;
	Sun,  7 Sep 2025 06:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 13:43:29 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To: Ahmad Gani <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v8 2/2] gwproxy: refactor code base to add
 experimental raw DNS backend
Message-ID: <20250907064329.GB3438918-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
References: <20250829075557.598176-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
 <20250829075557.598176-3-reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
 <CAOG64qN+BXH0S5YTzBrgY4JAJPd-TSDpiOd8YSirU=BA0hUy2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgrjW-yAOoXU5RJpAsbLiZdHbjJHNJqeEM1gMxF3ZkseRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgpOzC_VFH0O8KD_vWzFv27JFxbW13yOrfWj8zD5bbFNSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgpdFCbmFUu+jJSb1jzaw2tM4r76vEUtvhwo9nadk2RH8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOG64qOL4Wi_Nbq-gMYFKDSUdiqVyb2ZxN3tuiYQpt=JtmtpgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aL0ImQBGb3b4Md4y@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
 <CAADvAgouDoKp3_ZLyHMwcNtouzHcaSYq=QEdEKu9GK+q+zniBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgpN3kmwreA7OkVVnUGnnMVsWnPVy2KxaHZu5WmPdhRo+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAADvAgpN3kmwreA7OkVVnUGnnMVsWnPVy2KxaHZu5WmPdhRo+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gw-Outgoing-Server-Hash: 01afd303c8b96d0c1d5e80aa96a4ee40ec69888f786fa24107c0862c0644af79
X-Gw-Message-ID: 690dd880985d0a42d2bdb5ddadf81cbcfe91a68532b02445cc56e3f6edcdc8cb
X-Gw-PM-Hash: 520861c61013bf5416b1bc71a39e945deaa5e303b1c1161cdb62ce9c850bc926
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0700, Ahmad Gani wrote:
> Oh wait, I think it's indeed more efficient to use stack rather than
> checking for NULL, if the session_map is occupied in linear, the checking
> may take longer to iterate until it finds NULL.

That's right, using stack will give you O(1) lookup. Constant time.

-- 
Ammar Faizi