From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=new2025; t=1757852199; bh=PNUevhZo3fGQiFxgkRk2BjVSPx7Zn04fXOmxpXQzQNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:X-Gw-Outgoing-Server-Hash:X-Gw-Message-ID: X-Gw-PM-Hash:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc: User-Agent:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NyEvHxmEP4YAQ1hnBVygw55tciL3wuEYsGE0PGrrl+bvF0Wnq2EdqdqjmyQyxwjRj xmt7af7OR09Mqook7cJuppsS/RS53O9CWsmkv4l9g1+fHY+lIcBb+mUCsYycKKu1In +smbQCTX5KJiOykkQUpt3SiYg5mkyYErx4KTuOb7pbtaBNe8Dmc1BmsaJuM1e8dJhO SlfX+Xjyg28SU6QjPBygs9xtRX0z7Q0PFIqMxT5HQJDfNyGMmVzyCHfAyOw2VKOw0d tKXhKGHLUENU5vYRCkoKmLawJxtE9huiw8t5uuqhKzsxGeK5ipcF8QG9gWuIidmxdN Ntwiun5RLZ+Vw== Received: from linux.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.253.126.238]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D84631279E6; Sun, 14 Sep 2025 12:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 19:16:33 +0700 From: Ammar Faizi To: Ahmad Gani Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v11 6/6] gwproxy: Reduce #ifdef CONFIG_RAW_DNS Message-ID: <20250914121633.GA774647-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> References: <20250914050943.184934-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> <20250914050943.184934-7-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250914050943.184934-7-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> X-Gw-Outgoing-Server-Hash: 01afd303c8b96d0c1d5e80aa96a4ee40ec69888f786fa24107c0862c0644af79 X-Gw-Message-ID: b90ba0944ffc4e6061a7e7649aebd32f58cba2c922973ec8876ff72adc881b1f X-Gw-PM-Hash: e958c5e7d9a2f8d6d0cd0e8b33e5f7e6b636124e1dc77e753e3495a548457b1f List-Id: On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 12:09:40PM +0700, Ahmad Gani wrote: > No need to wrap struct members in #ifdef, adding a couple of bytes isn't > a big deal. Then why did you add it in the first place? Again, don't add a patch to undo your previous patch. Something like this should just be squashed. How many times more should I tell you this again? Please stop vibe-coding. I have been observing your patch submissions since July and I saw various characters that don't actually exist on keyboard in your commit. And I believe it's a very clear indication that it was not written via a keyboard, but copy-pasted from somewhere else, likely AIs. I did not have problems with your prior patches, but your habbit being driven by AIs in writing patches is not actually healthy down the road. Especially, when you're working on more complex things like this, the result is horribly ridiculous. It's fine to use AI, but it's not fine to let AI dominate your work. -- Ammar Faizi