From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A46DCCA473 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233375AbiFXOxX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:53:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59320 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233363AbiFXOwy (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:52:54 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0C07FD26 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 9so1641803ill.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DWcyz906WJfvMFL2VVjgjsdhhZt0R2JBG5BvPCvlnPE=; b=kAZfa4Gvw0mMhZjLyDIabymc1EmZA6j/Ij9km3tKCr2BFPbswn26/J6hUzgzxK1udT LXghN15N0v7AXCHZjA2DZSNUqDb8GKoz3EPZn168zMo/kyOYC8fhdWqF/to68Cm5uxLi KUmvke0fE3Nb+xs/xxNlvH/wfLHfkCsapDQ8szgjNP6dRJ5TGPFoxdXQ3s+3EWsusHWR 9J/fh9bzOC3ORimLqxSc/OtThU3lq68I5z0UVi8MeqqhfTtGrGxDnG19KA2TV9dSV3bW BgGazgp0V8riFQG6oC8SqJWq18ANKzv8SntphwIcsljLarq5zbbOYF/a54oGxURUkgY4 Aq7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DWcyz906WJfvMFL2VVjgjsdhhZt0R2JBG5BvPCvlnPE=; b=JFa8s0oDufONwaR2ioKbCQEEEHVYFm0iwmbYGnqpyrqLyuvxMzetNfs+eMWqRuVSfV Trr3UkJiTi9cXnlrxSLVCikCaBS2cXqH7Eva5fbXGRUvHqzusA8bZwtSU2BaR7jMcqxv vR0VknZEWTnkrdwgDbFAMo4OdyXkEr3r4MiFK8hZqAvYG9+F9HXMmA80snK4AtgV8yhS DSZp6Yr2CfJoIsr80eePQs24BJ2jHwwhC4WxxOuXlyOWMbNcOmI9tB1CquocdIIPF/us 90RZolSA5MKcXX84HInUUVQRugJtouG0sCUG799F3pCvXSApDRLwf2uIHJy8C6lwTofF 29WA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/UW2F7zNld6xzXpBZ2ONMAfhq16uVAFrD5RK1x+q1P54oytlEv 1Yp9lHVcN63mgOTKMKgZbLbFbw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vtQ5lI0ui69eAPGDOvVUnSBy1LS9YB7l1nUJUBdVR6AuykMTvdZaQ+wwkP8ETAWatGVBndKg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1ba3:b0:2d8:d74b:8ff6 with SMTP id n3-20020a056e021ba300b002d8d74b8ff6mr8714104ili.264.1656082134104; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.172] ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e25-20020a0566380cd900b00339ee768069sm1137354jak.74.2022.06.24.07.48.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <293e593d-2f2a-623e-bf2f-786fce623327@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:48:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 07/14] fs: Add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks Content-Language: en-US To: Christoph Hellwig , Stefan Roesch Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Christian Brauner References: <20220623175157.1715274-1-shr@fb.com> <20220623175157.1715274-8-shr@fb.com> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 6/23/22 11:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > FYI, I think a subject like > > "fs: add a FMODE_BUF_WASYNC flags for f_mode" > > might be a more descriptive. As the new flag here really is the > interesting part, not that we check it. Agree on that - if others do too, I can just make that edit. -- Jens Axboe