From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.86.80] (unknown [180.246.144.41]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEB5580615; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 16:57:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1659977856; bh=/OGOJQIWPxdrSQ5ocjgVJh/1nFP46kbWJPlJHPapsoY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=RN/+5u8/dW6DenwJNHcep7w1hiLq1mCuIj7lq/8P65rilL7lzfEhMOYyuWcP2Qwx0 PesuvdqHmrqADncB60ifFn9wvq803kPhNzAWKuhnIbnXbsOtWLDdSCY7nu7dx+lS4W ccPw7Pvsv6K4dIMJTMvbipFwWOHzjMWiXe1rvCBWKW58LNRTYni4SNfMfNf10bJx2b stkFkfkTsdi44obPItTipd+0YedhswSL3NvBPkHLLfmMpn/2ViEm6xm0fZQITet1H8 7v53erC0nwJTUG4tFkzsR4iLrTk5ZhDf23Z+Go5BzthAdS9u8Rj7aQzDdCi0qMUDVw nrTZmgf2V4DgQ== Message-ID: <2fd07224-6c00-78d7-d9d3-625d99b6ecc1@gnuweeb.org> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:57:19 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Change mov $0, %reg with xor %reg, %reg Content-Language: en-US To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Bill Metzenthen , Brijesh Singh , Joerg Roedel , Josh Poimboeuf , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Mark Rutland , Michael Roth , Peter Zijlstra , Sean Christopherson , Steven Rostedt , Ammar Faizi , GNU/Weeb Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20220804152656.8840-1-knscarlet@gnuweeb.org> <20220804152656.8840-2-knscarlet@gnuweeb.org> <20220804180805.9077-1-knscarlet@gnuweeb.org> From: Kanna Scarlet In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 8/5/22 4:54 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 06:08:05PM +0000, Kanna Scarlet wrote: >> Hello sir Borislav, > > Please, no "sir" - just Boris or Borislav, ok, sorry > I don't think you need to do that - you can do this one patch in order > to go through the whole process of creating and submitting a patch but > you should not go on a "let's convert everything" spree just for the > sake of it. ok, i will try to finish the process for this one patch for learning the submitting process. After that I will avoid touching similar small improvement and focus on real kernel bugs/issues, i'll send v2 revision with only commit message improvement > Because maintainers barely have time to look at patches, you don't have > to send them more when they're not really needed. > > Rather, I'd suggest you go and try to fix real bugs. This has some ideas > what to do: > > https://www.linux.com/news/three-ways-beginners-contribute-linux-kernel/ > > Looking at the kernel bugzilla and trying to understand and reproduce a > bug from there would get you a long way. And you'll learn a lot. > > Also, you should peruse > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/index.html > > which has a lot of information about how this whole community thing > works. > > I sincerely hope that helps. > > Thx. thank you for the guide, I'm following it Regards, -- Kanna Scarlet