From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [101.128.125.123]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 642C980908; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:58:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1666349881; bh=fKZku83OHfyRvSQLUx3jMx2YmtSY1Yp9y6uwfQjWAmk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bw4tPuq95+SGkOjSE2oR+z+SvhcpsF25/cgVmeLi5bEcmsbftWD8DdXlKji3zcxlD h0ZtKHdVAUxZpHQiycuoz+pQtUfACwNCEXYSj/3vN+QDiK86kXwmvN0G5qyNxIEYYg /c1GZSh1ntrgVMKWMk4g8x3nFKGI0ix5RqOuo8ZugzraTg2Jaq58FZh7bzNU/pE2JC 5i3uLNjjtcEFU4cl/wexHDTUXLFd8ezGMjvSgdrZpprJlsoJgInz9CtcMoG0vSjAmW JF6c5qu4gTVQb9U1CoHx4IZy7G61EMlmf6ybGCyM1I7EPobKlK2OexbILr9xqmIYoA 4zRi3H+hG9p2w== Message-ID: <4fb80411-f1e6-b01d-2e79-70df1f7b781e@gnuweeb.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:57:57 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] atom: Small change for fix_utf8_char() Content-Language: en-US To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20221020083845.907-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <20221020083845.907-5-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <553365db-106b-dc91-108c-38b3d9b0bbba@gnuweeb.org> <1af6bd52-d817-c22f-f757-9fa034e2a166@gnuweeb.org> <7bf0d319-cedc-3cc3-e440-c63bb5980dc4@gnuweeb.org> <3e68d38a-4076-21c6-3765-fcc116d67362@gnuweeb.org> From: Muhammad Rizki In-Reply-To: <3e68d38a-4076-21c6-3765-fcc116d67362@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 21/10/2022 17.54, Ammar Faizi wrote: > On 10/21/22 5:52 PM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: >> Hmm, I didn't realize it's a bug. Because it is very weird when you >> tested it and the email payload is empty after sent to Telegram. But, >> mine doesn't. > > "doesn't" what? > You can look into the Discord channel in the #test-bot, you can see it's not broken like you complaining when I tested it. Jump to: https://discord.com/channels/845302963739033611/865963658726211604/1032970393113337947 Same sample: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/f905c8cb-702f-6b2c-8954-1a736feb1ee7@kernel.dk/raw