public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Cc: "David S . Miller" <[email protected]>,
	Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>,
	Jonathan Lemon <[email protected]>,
	Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: [RFC net-next v3 07/29] net: don't track pfmemalloc for managed frags
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:56:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5271342adcb77d39d148906bbbe215c1bbca3907.1653992701.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Managed pages contain pinned userspace pages and controlled by upper
layers, there is no need in tracking skb->pfmemalloc for them.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 net/core/datagram.c    |  7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 5407cfd9cb89..6cca146be1f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2549,6 +2549,22 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_pagelen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return skb_headlen(skb) + __skb_pagelen(skb);
 }
 
+static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(struct skb_shared_info *shinfo,
+					      int i, struct page *page,
+					      int off, int size)
+{
+	skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
+
+	/*
+	 * Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is
+	 * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely
+	 * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm).
+	 */
+	frag->bv_page		  = page;
+	frag->bv_offset		  = off;
+	skb_frag_size_set(frag, size);
+}
+
 /**
  * __skb_fill_page_desc - initialise a paged fragment in an skb
  * @skb: buffer containing fragment to be initialised
@@ -2565,17 +2581,7 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_pagelen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
 					struct page *page, int off, int size)
 {
-	skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i];
-
-	/*
-	 * Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is
-	 * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely
-	 * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm).
-	 */
-	frag->bv_page		  = page;
-	frag->bv_offset		  = off;
-	skb_frag_size_set(frag, size);
-
+	__skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(skb_shinfo(skb), i, page, off, size);
 	page = compound_head(page);
 	if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
 		skb->pfmemalloc	= true;
diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index a93c05156f56..3c913a6342ad 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_copy_datagram_from_iter);
 static int __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				   struct iov_iter *from, size_t length)
 {
-	int frag = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
+	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
+	int frag = shinfo->nr_frags;
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct bvec_iter bi;
 	ssize_t copied = 0;
@@ -631,12 +632,14 @@ static int __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 		copied += v.bv_len;
 		truesize += PAGE_ALIGN(v.bv_len + v.bv_offset);
-		skb_fill_page_desc(skb, frag++, v.bv_page, v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
+		__skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(shinfo, frag++, v.bv_page,
+					   v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
 		bvec_iter_advance_single(from->bvec, &bi, v.bv_len);
 	}
 	if (bi.bi_size)
 		ret = -EMSGSIZE;
 
+	shinfo->nr_frags = frag;
 	from->bvec += bi.bi_idx;
 	from->nr_segs -= bi.bi_idx;
 	from->count = bi.bi_size;
-- 
2.36.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 18:56 [RFC net-next v3 00/29] io_uring zerocopy send Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 01/29] ipv4: avoid partial copy for zc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 02/29] ipv6: " Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 03/29] skbuff: add SKBFL_DONT_ORPHAN flag Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 04/29] skbuff: carry external ubuf_info in msghdr Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 05/29] net: bvec specific path in zerocopy_sg_from_iter Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 22:52   ` David Ahern
     [not found]     ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]       ` <[email protected]>
2022-07-05 14:03         ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 06/29] net: optimise bvec-based zc page referencing Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 08/29] skbuff: don't mix ubuf_info of different types Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 09/29] ipv4/udp: support zc with managed data Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 10/29] ipv6/udp: " Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 11/29] tcp: " Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 12/29] tcp: kill extra io_uring's uarg refcounting Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 13/29] net: let callers provide extra ubuf_info refs Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 14/29] io_uring: opcode independent fixed buf import Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 15/29] io_uring: add zc notification infrastructure Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 16/29] io_uring: cache struct io_notif Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 17/29] io_uring: complete notifiers in tw Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 18/29] io_uring: add notification slot registration Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 19/29] io_uring: rename IORING_OP_FILES_UPDATE Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 20/29] io_uring: add zc notification flush requests Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 21/29] io_uring: wire send zc request type Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 22/29] io_uring: account locked pages for non-fixed zc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 23/29] io_uring: allow to pass addr into sendzc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 24/29] io_uring: add rsrc referencing for notifiers Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 25/29] io_uring: sendzc with fixed buffers Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 26/29] io_uring: flush notifiers after sendzc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 27/29] io_uring: allow to override zc tag on flush Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 28/29] io_uring: batch submission notif referencing Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-28 18:56 ` [RFC net-next v3 29/29] selftests/io_uring: test zerocopy send Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5271342adcb77d39d148906bbbe215c1bbca3907.1653992701.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox