From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [RFC 09/11] io_uring: refactor io_run_task_work()
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:44:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65798ad1404ed1a33a2bb57eea78ca44f6963d54.1650548192.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
The second check in io_run_task_work() is there only for SQPOLL, for
which we use TWA_NONE. Remove the check and hand code SQPOLL specific
task_work running where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ea7b0c71ca8b..6397348748ad 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2793,9 +2793,7 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline bool io_run_task_work(void)
{
- struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
-
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) || (tctx && tctx->task_running)) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
clear_notify_signal();
io_uring_task_work_run();
@@ -10382,6 +10380,10 @@ static __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all,
prepare_to_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_run_task_work();
+ if (tctx->task_running) {
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ io_uring_task_work_run();
+ }
io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
/*
--
2.36.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-21 13:44 [RFC 00/11] io_uring specific task_work infra Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 01/11] io_uring: optimise io_req_task_work_add Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 02/11] io_uringg: add io_should_fail_tw() helper Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 03/11] io_uring: ban tw queue for exiting processes Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 04/11] io_uring: don't take ctx refs in tctx_task_work() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 05/11] io_uring: add dummy io_uring_task_work_run() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 06/11] task_work: add helper for signalling a task Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 07/11] io_uring: run io_uring task_works on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 08/11] io_uring: wire io_uring specific task work Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 10/11] io_uring: remove priority tw list Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 11/11] io_uring: lock-free task_work stack Pavel Begunkov
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-04-22 8:45 ` [RFC 00/11] io_uring specific task_work infra Hao Xu
2022-04-22 11:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65798ad1404ed1a33a2bb57eea78ca44f6963d54.1650548192.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox