public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>,
	Pranith Kumar <[email protected]>,
	Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
	David Laight <[email protected]>,
	Mark Brown <[email protected]>,
	Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
	Shuah Khan <[email protected]>,
	Fernanda Ma'rouf <[email protected]>,
	Linux Kselftest Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nolibc: add preliminary self tests
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:03:58 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 7/20/22 4:44 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I'm obviously interested in comments, but really, I don't want to
> overdesign something for a first step, it remains a very modest test
> program and I'd like that it remains easy to hack on it and to contribute
> new tests that are deemed useful.

I personally hate how the test framework mandates:

   "There must be exactly one test per line."

which makes the test case, for example, one long liner like this:

   if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break;

that's ugly and hard to read. Can we get rid of this "one test per line" rule?

It would be great if we followed the documented coding style that says:

    "Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
     unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
     not hide information." [1]

What we have here doesn't really increase the readability at all. Maybe
it's too late for 5.20, just for next in case we want to fix it.

Willy?

[1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.15/process/coding-style.html#breaking-long-lines-and-strings

-- 
Ammar Faizi


       reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <[email protected]>
2022-07-20 16:03 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-07-20 16:20   ` [PATCH 00/17] nolibc: add preliminary self tests Willy Tarreau
2022-07-20 17:05     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-07-20 17:14       ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox