From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F9BC433F5 for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 00:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232720AbiEWA5J (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 20:57:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232711AbiEWA5I (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 20:57:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159432EA34 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 17:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id w200so12301177pfc.10 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 17:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDCEsJ/WqthTybWOI/qPzCzf+m8Hs9NW8GCyLPvsqlA=; b=sL4YsPCS622CbXMUX2MZhnEMA2P3NvsaDiqoMBRdugV7rr6OC8BIibf4Q6osNJvs9Y /Xv9ErmckKPILz5GPectKN2VGZEQ6gtn3dsYxLwq1K5dNLRFrkj5HfSboFzYLfyx4SIX 2zqO/VqLOUdkjCd8VBnXuBuScWV6/8Bs2FBwcxwUJgrnN3tVkmBVP81sWQ+4Q+XCXP2R WdYZtWQhamQ5v4DihS4w7VXAGujcTnFtIzYRogjWyFS/R70tsDUbGY+V2omWt1rnZjcI zBdZZvVTzEh6D+E5LfwzqELJddlXLD7b7Mg9aG5QU73JndkfVZmNIBSgjDOm3k0oeDv4 ctuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDCEsJ/WqthTybWOI/qPzCzf+m8Hs9NW8GCyLPvsqlA=; b=byl03DFXw75NJ0zp4KC8b4TE2MBP7mReqXWYJ2N0dArIYCiLbqOvwNeha42BSiT3+r uT+gVBJ1pcww0d+9JieqodXRWNmqDk3uQrHnc0mUUIMrkZlvKw8ao7qRrjS9gkbiwouw aXitGHOKTWSQdluCKK1jPHC9I/efoU6xnpdrlGYZHtg41AxHJiqu33ZwSGFCadneIdHl cPLIf35tCG/kZDvStRRHBvU6WuJ7OwIULiZdykheWZMQIY65vtzWq6AhVk3itqiztefl LyJ9KYdwzldlrNgrWzh3vJnA5QHGzU9M+uBsn+5IHrnwUwqHSgJ01pnTSq87dCHVSzLr O1bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nHDqihLdmm7vr6umeVhsfVHpjTs33Qt5Sj6mmkkpdP7GjIY/4 TQ/nAaUhJ6EawjxCnWKr4p0nOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPb5y6749opIKhYoUHq1Gxb60o9WsLxTWe+nDqBTMLFG9jJL2V0wDnXLdDOWJ5pTPYcl6cmw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8895:0:b0:518:9fa0:7da with SMTP id z21-20020aa78895000000b005189fa007damr2948256pfe.48.1653267426326; Sun, 22 May 2022 17:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f11-20020a17090274cb00b0015e8d4eb26esm3687362plt.184.2022.05.22.17.57.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 May 2022 17:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <767778c5-ac0e-e798-38e0-199f54853cc6@kernel.dk> Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:57:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] rename & split tests Content-Language: en-US To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christian Brauner , Zorro Lang , fstests , Eryu Guan , Amir Goldstein , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <20220512165250.450989-1-brauner@kernel.org> <20220521231350.GY2306852@dread.disaster.area> <84e5e231-7c33-ad0f-fdd5-2d8c1052aa00@kernel.dk> <20220523001350.GB2306852@dread.disaster.area> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20220523001350.GB2306852@dread.disaster.area> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/22 6:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:19:51PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 5/21/22 7:07 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 5/21/22 5:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: >>>> [cc io_uring] >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >>>>> From: "Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" >>>>> >>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Please note that this patch series contains patches that will be >>>>> rejected by the fstests mailing list because of the amount of changes >>>>> they contain. So tools like b4 will not be able to find the whole patch >>>>> series on a mailing list. In case it's helpful I've added the >>>>> "fstests.vfstest.for-next" tag which can be pulled. Otherwise it's >>>>> possible to simply use the patch series as it appears in your inbox. >>>>> >>>>> All vfstests pass: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> #### xfs #### >>>>> ubuntu@imp1-vm:~/src/git/xfstests$ sudo ./check -g idmapped >>>>> FSTYP -- xfs (debug) >>>>> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 imp1-vm 5.18.0-rc4-fs-mnt-hold-writers-8a2e2350494f #107 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon May 9 12:12:34 UTC 2022 >>>>> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f /dev/sda4 >>>>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch >>>>> >>>>> generic/633 58s ... 58s >>>>> generic/644 62s ... 60s >>>>> generic/645 161s ... 161s >>>>> generic/656 62s ... 63s >>>>> xfs/152 133s ... 133s >>>>> xfs/153 94s ... 92s >>>>> Ran: generic/633 generic/644 generic/645 generic/656 xfs/152 xfs/153 >>>>> Passed all 6 tests >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if it's this series that has introduced a test bug or >>>> triggered a latent issue in the kernel, but I've started seeing >>>> generic/633 throw audit subsystem warnings on a single test machine >>>> as of late Friday: >>>> >>>> [ 7285.015888] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2147118 at kernel/auditsc.c:2035 __audit_syscall_entry+0x113/0x140 >>> >>> Does your kernel have this commit? >>> >>> commit 69e9cd66ae1392437234a63a3a1d60b6655f92ef >>> Author: Julian Orth >>> Date: Tue May 17 12:32:53 2022 +0200 >>> >>> audit,io_uring,io-wq: call __audit_uring_exit for dummy contexts > > No, that wasn't in -rc7. > >> I could not reproduce either with or without your patch when I finally >> got that test going and figure out how to turn on audit and get it >> enabled. I don't run with that. > > Ok. Given that this has been broken for over a year and nobody > has noticed until late .18-rcX, it might be worth adding an audit > enabled VM to your io-uring test farm.... It was in the 5.16 release, so it's ~4 months ago. Don't disagree on the testing, though I do think that's mostly on the audit side. I had no hand in any of that code. >>From my experience trying to reproduce it yesterday, my test distros don't even enable it and you have to both fiddle the config and add a boot parameter to even turn it on. And then it still didn't trigger for me. I'll see if I can add something to the testing mix for this. -- Jens Axboe