public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock
@ 2022-06-08 11:12 Hao Xu
  2022-06-08 11:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2022-06-08 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov

From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>

Add a new io_hash_bucket structure so that each bucket in cancel_hash
has separate spinlock. Use per entry lock for cancel_hash, this removes
some completion lock invocation and remove contension between different
cancel_hash entries.

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---

v1->v2:
 - Add per entry lock for poll/apoll task work code which was missed
   in v1
 - add an member in io_kiocb to track req's indice in cancel_hash

v2->v3:
 - make struct io_hash_bucket align with cacheline to avoid cacheline
   false sharing.
 - re-calculate hash value when deleting an entry from cancel_hash.
   (cannot leverage struct io_poll to store the indice since it's
    already 64 Bytes)

 io_uring/cancel.c         | 14 +++++++--
 io_uring/cancel.h         |  6 ++++
 io_uring/fdinfo.c         |  9 ++++--
 io_uring/io_uring.c       |  8 +++--
 io_uring/io_uring_types.h |  2 +-
 io_uring/poll.c           | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.c b/io_uring/cancel.c
index 83cceb52d82d..bced5d6b9294 100644
--- a/io_uring/cancel.c
+++ b/io_uring/cancel.c
@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ int io_try_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_cancel_data *cd)
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, cd);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto out;
+	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	if (!(cd->flags & IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_FD))
 		ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, cd);
-out:
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -192,3 +192,13 @@ int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
 	return IOU_OK;
 }
+
+inline void init_hash_table(struct io_hash_bucket *hash_table, unsigned size)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+		spin_lock_init(&hash_table[i].lock);
+		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&hash_table[i].list);
+	}
+}
diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.h b/io_uring/cancel.h
index 4f35d8696325..b57d6706f84d 100644
--- a/io_uring/cancel.h
+++ b/io_uring/cancel.h
@@ -4,3 +4,9 @@ int io_async_cancel_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
 int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
 
 int io_try_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_cancel_data *cd);
+inline void init_hash_table(struct io_hash_bucket *hash_table, unsigned size);
+
+struct io_hash_bucket {
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	struct hlist_head	list;
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
index fcedde4b4b1e..f941c73f5502 100644
--- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
+++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include "io_uring.h"
 #include "sqpoll.h"
 #include "fdinfo.h"
+#include "cancel.h"
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static __cold int io_uring_show_cred(struct seq_file *m, unsigned int id,
@@ -157,17 +158,19 @@ static __cold void __io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 		mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 
 	seq_puts(m, "PollList:\n");
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < (1U << ctx->cancel_hash_bits); i++) {
-		struct hlist_head *list = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
+		struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
 		struct io_kiocb *req;
 
-		hlist_for_each_entry(req, list, hash_node)
+		spin_lock(&hb->lock);
+		hlist_for_each_entry(req, &hb->list, hash_node)
 			seq_printf(m, "  op=%d, task_works=%d\n", req->opcode,
 					task_work_pending(req->task));
+		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 	}
 
 	seq_puts(m, "CqOverflowList:\n");
+	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(ocqe, &ctx->cq_overflow_list, list) {
 		struct io_uring_cqe *cqe = &ocqe->cqe;
 
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 1572ebe3cff1..b67ab76b9e56 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -725,11 +725,13 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
 	if (hash_bits <= 0)
 		hash_bits = 1;
 	ctx->cancel_hash_bits = hash_bits;
-	ctx->cancel_hash = kmalloc((1U << hash_bits) * sizeof(struct hlist_head),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
+	ctx->cancel_hash =
+		kmalloc((1U << hash_bits) * sizeof(struct io_hash_bucket),
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx->cancel_hash)
 		goto err;
-	__hash_init(ctx->cancel_hash, 1U << hash_bits);
+
+	init_hash_table(ctx->cancel_hash, 1U << hash_bits);
 
 	ctx->dummy_ubuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx->dummy_ubuf), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx->dummy_ubuf)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
index 7c22cf35a7e2..b67843a5f3b6 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
 		 * manipulate the list, hence no extra locking is needed there.
 		 */
 		struct io_wq_work_list	iopoll_list;
-		struct hlist_head	*cancel_hash;
+		struct io_hash_bucket	*cancel_hash;
 		unsigned		cancel_hash_bits;
 		bool			poll_multi_queue;
 
diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index 0df5eca93b16..515f1727e3c6 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include "opdef.h"
 #include "kbuf.h"
 #include "poll.h"
+#include "cancel.h"
 
 struct io_poll_update {
 	struct file			*file;
@@ -73,10 +74,22 @@ static struct io_poll *io_poll_get_single(struct io_kiocb *req)
 static void io_poll_req_insert(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
-	struct hlist_head *list;
+	u32 index = hash_long(req->cqe.user_data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits);
+	struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[index];
 
-	list = &ctx->cancel_hash[hash_long(req->cqe.user_data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits)];
-	hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, list);
+	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
+	hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &hb->list);
+	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+}
+
+static void io_poll_req_delete(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	u32 index = hash_long(req->cqe.user_data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits);
+	spinlock_t *lock = &ctx->cancel_hash[index].lock;
+
+	spin_lock(lock);
+	hash_del(&req->hash_node);
+	spin_unlock(lock);
 }
 
 static void io_init_poll_iocb(struct io_poll *poll, __poll_t events,
@@ -220,8 +233,8 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 	}
 
 	io_poll_remove_entries(req);
+	io_poll_req_delete(req, ctx);
 	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	hash_del(&req->hash_node);
 	req->cqe.flags = 0;
 	__io_req_complete_post(req);
 	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
@@ -231,7 +244,6 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 
 static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 {
-	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = io_poll_check_events(req, locked);
@@ -239,9 +251,7 @@ static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 		return;
 
 	io_poll_remove_entries(req);
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	hash_del(&req->hash_node);
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+	io_poll_req_delete(req, req->ctx);
 
 	if (!ret)
 		io_req_task_submit(req, locked);
@@ -435,9 +445,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	io_poll_req_insert(req);
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
 	if (mask && (poll->events & EPOLLET)) {
 		/* can't multishot if failed, just queue the event we've got */
@@ -534,32 +542,32 @@ __cold bool io_poll_remove_all(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk,
 	bool found = false;
 	int i;
 
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < (1U << ctx->cancel_hash_bits); i++) {
-		struct hlist_head *list;
+		struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
 
-		list = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
-		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, list, hash_node) {
+		spin_lock(&hb->lock);
+		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &hb->list, hash_node) {
 			if (io_match_task_safe(req, tsk, cancel_all)) {
 				hlist_del_init(&req->hash_node);
 				io_poll_cancel_req(req);
 				found = true;
 			}
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	return found;
 }
 
 static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool poll_only,
 				     struct io_cancel_data *cd)
-	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
-	struct hlist_head *list;
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
 
-	list = &ctx->cancel_hash[hash_long(cd->data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits)];
-	hlist_for_each_entry(req, list, hash_node) {
+	u32 index = hash_long(cd->data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits);
+	struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[index];
+
+	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(req, &hb->list, hash_node) {
 		if (cd->data != req->cqe.user_data)
 			continue;
 		if (poll_only && req->opcode != IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
@@ -569,47 +577,48 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool poll_only,
 				continue;
 			req->work.cancel_seq = cd->seq;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 		return req;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
 static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_file_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 					  struct io_cancel_data *cd)
-	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < (1U << ctx->cancel_hash_bits); i++) {
-		struct hlist_head *list;
+		struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
 
-		list = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
-		hlist_for_each_entry(req, list, hash_node) {
+		spin_lock(&hb->lock);
+		hlist_for_each_entry(req, &hb->list, hash_node) {
 			if (!(cd->flags & IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_ANY) &&
 			    req->file != cd->file)
 				continue;
 			if (cd->seq == req->work.cancel_seq)
 				continue;
 			req->work.cancel_seq = cd->seq;
+			spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 			return req;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
 
 static bool io_poll_disarm(struct io_kiocb *req)
-	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
 	if (!io_poll_get_ownership(req))
 		return false;
 	io_poll_remove_entries(req);
-	hash_del(&req->hash_node);
+	io_poll_req_delete(req, req->ctx);
 	return true;
 }
 
 int io_poll_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_cancel_data *cd)
-	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
 
@@ -718,14 +727,11 @@ int io_poll_remove(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	int ret2, ret = 0;
 	bool locked;
 
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	preq = io_poll_find(ctx, true, &cd);
 	if (!preq || !io_poll_disarm(preq)) {
-		spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 		ret = preq ? -EALREADY : -ENOENT;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
 	if (poll_update->update_events || poll_update->update_user_data) {
 		/* only mask one event flags, keep behavior flags */

base-commit: d8271bf021438f468dab3cd84fe5279b5bbcead8
-- 
2.25.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock
  2022-06-08 11:12 [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock Hao Xu
@ 2022-06-08 11:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2022-06-08 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao Xu, io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe

On 6/8/22 12:12, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> 
> Add a new io_hash_bucket structure so that each bucket in cancel_hash
> has separate spinlock. Use per entry lock for cancel_hash, this removes
> some completion lock invocation and remove contension between different
> cancel_hash entries.

Thanks for making the changes, the big picture looks good,
I'll review in a day or two


> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2:
>   - Add per entry lock for poll/apoll task work code which was missed
>     in v1
>   - add an member in io_kiocb to track req's indice in cancel_hash
> 
> v2->v3:
>   - make struct io_hash_bucket align with cacheline to avoid cacheline
>     false sharing.
>   - re-calculate hash value when deleting an entry from cancel_hash.
>     (cannot leverage struct io_poll to store the indice since it's
>      already 64 Bytes)
> 
>   io_uring/cancel.c         | 14 +++++++--
>   io_uring/cancel.h         |  6 ++++
>   io_uring/fdinfo.c         |  9 ++++--
>   io_uring/io_uring.c       |  8 +++--
>   io_uring/io_uring_types.h |  2 +-
>   io_uring/poll.c           | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>   6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock
  2022-06-08 11:12 [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock Hao Xu
  2022-06-08 11:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2022-06-10 15:45   ` Hao Xu
  2022-06-11  4:34   ` Hao Xu
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2022-06-10 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao Xu, io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe

On 6/8/22 12:12, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> 
> Add a new io_hash_bucket structure so that each bucket in cancel_hash
> has separate spinlock. Use per entry lock for cancel_hash, this removes
> some completion lock invocation and remove contension between different
> cancel_hash entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2:
>   - Add per entry lock for poll/apoll task work code which was missed
>     in v1
>   - add an member in io_kiocb to track req's indice in cancel_hash
> 
> v2->v3:
>   - make struct io_hash_bucket align with cacheline to avoid cacheline
>     false sharing.
>   - re-calculate hash value when deleting an entry from cancel_hash.
>     (cannot leverage struct io_poll to store the indice since it's
>      already 64 Bytes)
> 
>   io_uring/cancel.c         | 14 +++++++--
>   io_uring/cancel.h         |  6 ++++
>   io_uring/fdinfo.c         |  9 ++++--
>   io_uring/io_uring.c       |  8 +++--
>   io_uring/io_uring_types.h |  2 +-
>   io_uring/poll.c           | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>   6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.c b/io_uring/cancel.c
> index 83cceb52d82d..bced5d6b9294 100644
> --- a/io_uring/cancel.c
> +++ b/io_uring/cancel.c
> @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ int io_try_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_cancel_data *cd)
>   	if (!ret)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>   	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, cd);
>   	if (ret != -ENOENT)
>   		goto out;
> +	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>   	if (!(cd->flags & IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_FD))
>   		ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, cd);
> -out:
>   	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
> +out:
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> @@ -192,3 +192,13 @@ int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>   	io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
>   	return IOU_OK;
>   }
> +
> +inline void init_hash_table(struct io_hash_bucket *hash_table, unsigned size)

Not inline, it can break builds

> diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.h b/io_uring/cancel.h
> index 4f35d8696325..b57d6706f84d 100644
> --- a/io_uring/cancel.h
> +++ b/io_uring/cancel.h
> @@ -4,3 +4,9 @@ int io_async_cancel_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>   int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>   
>   int io_try_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_cancel_data *cd);
> +inline void init_hash_table(struct io_hash_bucket *hash_table, unsigned size);

And this inline as well

> diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
> index 0df5eca93b16..515f1727e3c6 100644
> --- a/io_uring/poll.c
> +++ b/io_uring/poll.c
[...]
>   static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool poll_only,
>   				     struct io_cancel_data *cd)
> -	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
>   {
> -	struct hlist_head *list;
>   	struct io_kiocb *req;
>   
> -	list = &ctx->cancel_hash[hash_long(cd->data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits)];
> -	hlist_for_each_entry(req, list, hash_node) {
> +	u32 index = hash_long(cd->data, ctx->cancel_hash_bits);
> +	struct io_hash_bucket *hb = &ctx->cancel_hash[index];
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(req, &hb->list, hash_node) {
>   		if (cd->data != req->cqe.user_data)
>   			continue;
>   		if (poll_only && req->opcode != IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
> @@ -569,47 +577,48 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool poll_only,
>   				continue;
>   			req->work.cancel_seq = cd->seq;
>   		}
> +		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);

The problem here is that after you unlock, nothing keeps the
request alive. Before it was more like

lock(completion_lock);
req = poll_find();
cancel_poll(req);
unlock(completion_lock);

and was relying on all of this happening under ->completion_lock.
Now following io_poll_disarm() and/or io_poll_cancel_req() race.
Same with io_poll_file_find().

Should be fine apart from this

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock
  2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2022-06-10 15:45   ` Hao Xu
  2022-06-11  4:34   ` Hao Xu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2022-06-10 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe

 
> The problem here is that after you unlock, nothing keeps the
> request alive. Before it was more like
> 
> lock(completion_lock);
> req = poll_find();
> cancel_poll(req);
> unlock(completion_lock);
> 
> and was relying on all of this happening under ->completion_lock.
> Now following io_poll_disarm() and/or io_poll_cancel_req() race.
> Same with io_poll_file_find().

Looks we have to add completion_lock back for cancellation path.

> 
> Should be fine apart from this
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock
  2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2022-06-10 15:45   ` Hao Xu
@ 2022-06-11  4:34   ` Hao Xu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2022-06-11  4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe

On 6/10/22 18:21, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/8/22 12:12, Hao Xu wrote:
>> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Add a new io_hash_bucket structure so that each bucket in cancel_hash
>> has separate spinlock. Use per entry lock for cancel_hash, this removes
>> some completion lock invocation and remove contension between different
>> cancel_hash entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> v1->v2:
>>   - Add per entry lock for poll/apoll task work code which was missed
>>     in v1
>>   - add an member in io_kiocb to track req's indice in cancel_hash
>>
>> v2->v3:
>>   - make struct io_hash_bucket align with cacheline to avoid cacheline
>>     false sharing.
>>   - re-calculate hash value when deleting an entry from cancel_hash.
>>     (cannot leverage struct io_poll to store the indice since it's
>>      already 64 Bytes)
>>
>>   io_uring/cancel.c         | 14 +++++++--
>>   io_uring/cancel.h         |  6 ++++
>>   io_uring/fdinfo.c         |  9 ++++--
>>   io_uring/io_uring.c       |  8 +++--
>>   io_uring/io_uring_types.h |  2 +-
>>   io_uring/poll.c           | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>   6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.c b/io_uring/cancel.c
>> index 83cceb52d82d..bced5d6b9294 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/cancel.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/cancel.c
>> @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ int io_try_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, struct 
>> io_cancel_data *cd)
>>       if (!ret)
>>           return 0;
>> -    spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>       ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, cd);
>>       if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>           goto out;
>> +    spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>       if (!(cd->flags & IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_FD))
>>           ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, cd);
>> -out:
>>       spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>> +out:
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> @@ -192,3 +192,13 @@ int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, 
>> unsigned int issue_flags)
>>       io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
>>       return IOU_OK;
>>   }
>> +
>> +inline void init_hash_table(struct io_hash_bucket *hash_table, 
>> unsigned size)
> 
> Not inline, it can break builds
> 

What do you mean? It's compiled well.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-11  4:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-08 11:12 [PATCH v3] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock Hao Xu
2022-06-08 11:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-10 10:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-10 15:45   ` Hao Xu
2022-06-11  4:34   ` Hao Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox