From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from [192.168.12.80] (unknown [182.2.69.158])
	by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5614E7E2BC;
	Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:42:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=default; t=1647952927;
	bh=wEvnoUYj5ItswMTYHtWE6EYw1sIxWYk5k1yPNx8RgUo=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=bKvuMOfW27+DJg7Cb3IpAkuLP43KoZHx8Z4IArrq2g8zvnixi0UFKCkRnZqe4ZvKo
	 5UqtiZsNZgxIqlegbzo84BeNcSTxnrjejdDkzIg8lSCYzz7JCXRPaQukDE81e0Drkq
	 gn9W1bYkv6FszyNdyAKcdtqq8vtdm2OVH/K0WaU7WjVYkvVO7rhT2dKeaEiZdHIAav
	 M4Me5jw/ku/x6dVDGk03VbLK6hwZSMcUtXSmWHEyjqVliQLMqbcwbvNSA76Q/sQPha
	 DemYIPB8jbR90pan0w9VBdWr7icJaMvj0Th8KVYcjEedA42MIwEfcT0SyfUbhGZTJE
	 S4Tr9XT3nzpcA==
Message-ID: <8e3470c9-8bfd-3397-03c7-9bd77ed1ae06@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:42:02 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] tools/nolibc/stdlib: Implement `malloc()`,
 `calloc()`, `realloc()` and `free()`
Content-Language: en-US
To: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, Nugraha <richiisei@gmail.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
References: <20220322102115.186179-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <20220322102115.186179-7-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <56935393241242adab6f32c50dd74c23@AcuMS.aculab.com>
 <28dd5f67-0c59-8ea0-8798-55757a6b05f6@gnuweeb.org>
 <CAOG64qP2qiyOQaTJ56Cg2w=Q=euDbSjqkOVOLKJHMq-xAS2U7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOG64qP2qiyOQaTJ56Cg2w=Q=euDbSjqkOVOLKJHMq-xAS2U7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On 3/22/22 7:36 PM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:18 PM Ammar Faizi wrote:
>> Rounding up is not useful here, because we don't have any free list to keep
>> track the unused block of memory. I mean, even if it's rounded up, the extra
>> space after rounded up cannot be utilized with this design. There is no
>> book-keeping that tracks it.
>>
>> Though, the kernel still allocates the size in multiple page size.
> 
> BTW, what David meant probably, don't call mmap() again if heap->len
> is greater than new_len. Isn't that simple enough to give it a go?

Ah yes, I get the idea now, it shouldn't be a burden for this series. I
think that small improvement is not too overkill. So I will take that
suggestion for the next series.

Thanks!

-- 
Ammar Faizi