From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.88.254] (unknown [125.160.109.234]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 302847E3B9; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:06:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1663952788; bh=MwNXbfAILrDPPbtlLlNktqHpyW5d2sOfl0ygwZr/WgE=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fQqlcBvdXfDACilX9JqRoAmp+QFbl+Eq58APd0eic2xkBRqcEq20+V5NBbhbAH/RS +f38D8UpBtSdnJkIQWMzWGeTZCS0rFK7f4JaZx5KY5aKZzJak3jCclDaFc4AUeOJCH NXAhPVneZauIxajv9CFNatoVsxhDSpt7V+goOG6+rzPP+G9l9Cgkz63GusuqqKLJL1 SqcffNVdL4LzmvOQh+8K3n3b/Qq1HEaA1MUnl+6ugYvdNdS14Dhv90TZkric8eqC79 nXXe4STNZQi4/hk7uaXeMYE10dlSn9vZmIpk1jr1q8NNEYZ1KAoAZxVhO33v00bZHk EWdOFKXLhhiSQ== Message-ID: <9069f1bb-38a2-ceed-effa-c33b2a28aa58@gnuweeb.org> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:06:25 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/17] Refactor Telegram & initial work Discord Content-Language: en-US From: Ammar Faizi To: Muhammad Rizki Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20220920134812.331-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <137fc03d-b226-637e-b6d3-0dc425853d58@gnuweeb.org> <5da84f12-ad82-57de-02d9-55dab0bacf8e@gnuweeb.org> <37663048-e228-aa20-4e09-417054c25777@gnuweeb.org> In-Reply-To: <37663048-e228-aa20-4e09-417054c25777@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 9/24/22 12:04 AM, Ammar Faizi wrote: > On 9/24/22 12:02 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: >> It's because I'm not adding the sync command too, this RFC patch should be my initial work only. > > Please add that in the next version of this RFC. Make me able to test > this RFC is absolutely mandatory, so I'll wait for a v5. While in there, I'll leave some comments on specific patches if I find something to comment. -- Ammar Faizi