From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiizuha@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [101.128.125.226])
	by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB5608060F;
	Wed,  3 Aug 2022 13:01:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=default; t=1659531713;
	bh=lffoFIW3lElfEkf++VR5GGpLmWv3RAqky6PY8w7Cl3g=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=p7i1Msq5073AHefXobAn/xxukhUbn96KofGcEIygCAJbrmy4TYZ3Abkh44vnUT3lR
	 aOy/DqqGma59SCG3/Z0cObzJz/etRuCPIS2I1WTk+GymHyhhhWvJuSIuvElojRGnlu
	 PgkE0FzjHXuOuMGCfu1cPbhWWNeVkuh+rmhVVJahDrwMBzR5cGy11tBogXIcF2uK+p
	 dyH5XsdhZDOn0jDNuACh9JahdxuNhBLhhYa6CslPiuOWyQGTHhxpejxyj7K10hfSXo
	 nc5zT6X9oAGUCxQ0e62ohWcJPOLmm5Mrwyb5fVDl7m2haWajtaZH21puDQ58xGhldU
	 T8Ob3NBG+Qa7g==
Message-ID: <9093781c-20b8-d1de-450c-3cd1c842b93e@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 20:01:47 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Use html.escape() for fix_utf8_chars()
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>,
 Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
References: <20220803102718.1084-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org>
 <20220803102718.1084-3-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org>
 <d6317091-355e-d87a-2acc-7f2f0e133d7f@gnuweeb.org>
From: Muhammad Rizki <kiizuha@gnuweeb.org>
In-Reply-To: <d6317091-355e-d87a-2acc-7f2f0e133d7f@gnuweeb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On 03/08/2022 19.49, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On 8/3/22 5:27 PM, Muhammad Rizki wrote:
>> return html.escape(html.escape(text))
> 
> I doubt about this double escape. Just to clear my doubt. Did you test
> this?

Tested and work as my expected.

> 
> I didn't, but you said previously that "<" is shown as "&gt;" which is
> totally garbage if that's the actual output. Rizki?
> 

Yes, with double html.escape() it can replace the previous code (with 
replace())