From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [101.128.125.123]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B258A80908; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:55:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1666349710; bh=9Mt3+TrkdtmyLo+weT5lVrXEpC073wWRc9eWp+18/Jo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=V8qUI6bKorDPaJkMLhOFHinQK+UYUS/V3c6orhRnOKnEcWubxkBBwqiJWncmtbSCC f/ZiLpbZpAkFPz9N0V+kj+qgRWQdrBug5Esfd+U0hKhcMVKfMV0zjXZof9S5Po8qIi N7H2nxJ37b2dJNsIiMpmexQUodG90P6aByTKr4rDgOAOvl0pERAf6RVMzTmCMM/Ln2 hAb+/Jja9QkTEIxI1GX+9EXlszUxImsfcJTQ9NZQZMoZBKnIEyLC1EjU9mEjYGry4Q rgFUB+zoyyqJ2awSdz3MBYEhvMweshR/yRpt3Jo8/63XjJEA1UuPUnR+HN5+hlGAck ZRmmEnbLPO1AQ== Message-ID: <90e2fdd9-ca4d-fa01-1682-1ac90bf51db3@gnuweeb.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:55:06 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] atom: Small change for fix_utf8_char() Content-Language: en-US To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20221020083845.907-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <20221020083845.907-5-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <553365db-106b-dc91-108c-38b3d9b0bbba@gnuweeb.org> <1af6bd52-d817-c22f-f757-9fa034e2a166@gnuweeb.org> <7bf0d319-cedc-3cc3-e440-c63bb5980dc4@gnuweeb.org> <3e68d38a-4076-21c6-3765-fcc116d67362@gnuweeb.org> From: Muhammad Rizki In-Reply-To: <3e68d38a-4076-21c6-3765-fcc116d67362@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 21/10/2022 17.54, Ammar Faizi wrote: > On 10/21/22 5:52 PM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: >> Hmm, I didn't realize it's a bug. Because it is very weird when you >> tested it and the email payload is empty after sent to Telegram. But, >> mine doesn't. > > "doesn't" what? > Doesn't have an empty email payload like you complaining.