From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [10.7.7.14] (unknown [182.253.88.229]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADF0D804D1; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 01:26:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1667784379; bh=ms0cZvl2OQKW3OH+r70sbgC6TG6QTIf5N8MRRCaSbaA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=qr5Sp0ejH46eA7/eYzLMMqzN7MXiCStNs7g6pCPZltNrQEzn3QUwFpb6T1+6oqUnJ K0XXTfBXgrCIIZKRdIkT3/+Sv4Fo4qu6TGBmk3UwU3hdGXQbGDZJIcT5OaWxqinrL9 LxUFYa8Hz0929bh+gV6m0LF7GYPjxkWi++g0HHdyZ+QXR5UdwX6sJuAiNsn8t4Rikh pReehg7YGcBC8cRgj5p13tfxMQNljhD1FDnWzyWvuWlLoPsdim1reMOwIOx8TnHz+n O/+TMKshfEs2nQMisxtGe/yUyqTZb4GRz5yE4GI1Fu3mKHUiPOdVOGRp3XGyvw8u+K Nl/7mKWLonUVg== Message-ID: <99ca9aae-0d1c-3cc1-1f7f-eee09ff99585@gnuweeb.org> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:26:15 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/16] utils: Improve fix_utf8_char() Content-Language: en-US To: Muhammad Rizki Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20221104180931.3852-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <20221104180931.3852-6-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <73b917bc-6d20-b2d1-f956-11d6e2ff1662@gnuweeb.org> <942fe0b7-9b12-0445-6c75-ad90addb0f21@gnuweeb.org> From: Ammar Faizi In-Reply-To: <942fe0b7-9b12-0445-6c75-ad90addb0f21@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 11/7/22 8:11 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: > From the past patch, some email doesn't escape correctly, like it > supposed to escaped "> >" to "> >", but the result keep "> >". > That problem is from the past, IDK if current patch will fix that escape > if using html.escape() 1 time. Any reproducer to try? -- Ammar Faizi