From: Ahmad Gani <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
"GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v11 4/6] gwproxy: Refactor code base to add experimental raw DNS backend
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:46:01 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADvAgoxrrrdvH6T2hh5-vasj8D0ONdxm06b9TFvT7d5+S0HtA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250914121417.GB31788-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 7:14 PM Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 12:09:38PM +0700, Ahmad Gani wrote:
> > Use fallback mechanism for raw DNS
> > If *_PREFER_* is used in the restyp, the raw DNS backend will attempt to
> > retry DNS query with different address family if it failed.
> >
> > Add new cmdline arguments:
> > - raw-dns: enables the experimental raw DNS feature
> > - dns-server: sets the default DNS server
> > - session-map-cap: sets the default capacity for the session_map and stack.arr arrays
> >
> > The struct gwp_dns_ctx is now exported due to the need for accessing it
> > outside dns.c.
>
> Let me tell you this again. Please ponder it seriously!
>
> Take a break. Use your brain to actually comprehend the meaning.
>
> Each patch should only do one substantial thing. And if **you refactor**
> something, **do it independently** with your feature addition. Don't mix
> them into a single patch.
>
> "Feature addition" **is not** a part of code refactoring. If you
> refactor something, there must not be a functional change.
>
> "Code refactoring" MUST NOT add a new feature.
Do I just need to rename the subject to "Integrate new experimental raw
DNS backend to the code base"? splitting this patch seems not a good idea
since the overall changes represent one substantial thing.
--
Ahmad Gani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-14 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-14 5:09 [PATCH gwproxy v11 0/6] Initial work on integration of DNS parser lib in gwproxy Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 1/6] dns: Use __sys_close instead of close Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 2/6] gwproxy: Define __maybe_unused macro Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 3/6] dnsparser: Add dns parser code Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 4/6] gwproxy: Refactor code base to add experimental raw DNS backend Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 12:14 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-09-14 13:54 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 17:46 ` Ahmad Gani [this message]
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 5/6] gwproxy: Update Makefile and configure scripts Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 12:55 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-09-14 17:45 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 5:09 ` [PATCH gwproxy v11 6/6] gwproxy: Reduce #ifdef CONFIG_RAW_DNS Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 12:16 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-09-14 14:26 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 17:45 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 17:59 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 18:13 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-09-15 2:21 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 17:44 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-09-14 19:02 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-09-15 2:50 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 12:51 ` (subset) [PATCH gwproxy v11 0/6] Initial work on integration of DNS parser lib in gwproxy Ammar Faizi
2025-09-14 17:22 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-09-14 18:07 ` Ahmad Gani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAADvAgoxrrrdvH6T2hh5-vasj8D0ONdxm06b9TFvT7d5+S0HtA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=reyuki@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox