From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=new2025; t=1754390648; bh=F1F20zVc8hgbTmkjN44FPjZSHsAHGjXxIMgDgH4R2Kk=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID:Date:From: Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eeu8hK2SzDBS2fVhrWORBsbHC4DuCKIM4JzsdXYiRvoD3NsW0HyLiwFX9lqLvWIbb yy5Arq9qO7hIZExQDiYZ7jBKVOF77KufZMhVhue5atUwR65zwN7ANA/9S+xyvNBouI CbfZMRJWM4K8lacOBh4q+awjfzCMUj121dtfacWjEoZW3XASRCODoOop4p+LSQ49ti erpyRyPyKi7/XkxK1bDaIrllQwwyetg4n8pkxSu36zR0yPaFkdyuhlZHUiyueijcdB RYfsLRbXUGp9EXdz89NP/f8DY5kPBux+fSHecn+zFso5y1Zl/a+mADy1B3S8Bnj+aL nNAxOTDXswPFQ== Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com (mail-lf1-f41.google.com [209.85.167.41]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7480312804E for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5561ab55c4dso5816227e87.2 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUQkMRpYmV9h0j4557nIDXkvheoHtkhyugPo6RAhwHio+MUcWPWvcMldVXGkL9xUkY7Crif@vger.gnuweeb.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyUb895apdfUJtGwWGKjO8CeWa+CHKdrX4dHVRLlKk8/zo+lMcn 5GmpQ3L4ryCdtZrweNO7PayuCupaOKLHcStz0+ZV4P84/LP8KlFlegcLEAOJgjQTSJzFxVKcw+6 13jvta+0R41tY/rYm2jrNxqs8XSmDP1o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEEWVySyjE7kdXWeFgv1cvqK7TsZ73X1j8t+AW1hRYLqh/bV0oxIAo8mmcZPAgCefojIxaY1cwi1e+7rX/pDEI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3c87:b0:553:cede:6a9 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55b97bab865mr3715922e87.55.1754390648094; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250805064933.109080-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> <20250805064933.109080-3-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ahmad Gani Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:43:30 +0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxrr4BYM_4kVpwzyg7ynqsTQ32CDZK1zx0ZQeK_8X3tTtHvEZR5gIruOB0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v3 2/9] dnslookup: Add a new parameter, default_port. To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 5:26=E2=80=AFPM Ammar Faizi wrote: > [ Please fix your name on the MUA. No pseudonyms or anonymous actors here= . ] [ Oops, sorry about that. It's now updated. ] > On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 05:15:46PM +0700, reyuki wrote: > > In the previous message, you mentioned that the new parameter should be > > separated from patch 1/9. Is it okay if I pick the commit for patch 1/9 > > during git rebase, edit it to remove prt, and preserve patch 2/9 as it = is? > > You can do the former, but you can't do the latter because patch #2 > depends on that `prt` change, which will not exist if you omit the `prt` > addtion in patch #1. So it won't apply, in rebase progress that will > conflict, obviously. Will changing this affect subsequent commits too? Does 'squashing' prevent conflict on subsequent commits? I'll try to learn about squash in git first= . -- Ahmad Gani