From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server-vie001.gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=new2025; t=1757227273;
	bh=sYUVN89f98PcPuUZJkfQLUWd7BMYn//yKyXc9sscAK8=;
	h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:
	 To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID:Date:From:
	 Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:
	 Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type:
	 Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=WNSE861doDbj5ZzDOYV/Tt0aqGrvnXhvdA7xHWiYjt0T+nxsirPquI8JRelGPJyZ8
	 P7A5EaCNcnc5ObRbB6GmsFoPBA+VQCDo8v3utEKKwOj+mGmIzdWY3VEmTgmRlxemvN
	 fiNpIGgJEJtaASDnEvpXm78nuuwyfSb2aE95eCkjWZhhW+uSI+es9DP0ocqS8NLSj/
	 Fs2rjZG+eX6rns9RmZjNT67LrQTMXCkZQSz0R1P4MfhFVIsE665f7Y2gKZecq6Ui3c
	 uRcHEtchmGTIOeOqui8tnKu+lo/qM+eOe5QewDMOb2K5fqRgn69vhgJIfFzmCbemF6
	 6/NE+166qwFgg==
Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com [209.85.208.181])
	by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 244EA31279DD
	for <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>; Sun,  7 Sep 2025 06:41:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-336b5c44a5bso37538131fa.1
        for <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 23:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWnXVoqls4/fpCdC3pBy8kQSZE2lX39bIJYCSPJz/S1yOjqG7ys+Ui1qqM6aQBP2azRyeeg@vger.gnuweeb.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZHRESFvgTFE3l7dCh9POd/tahBPcZ3eU/yHpb+xAozLMCzi8L
	oElgNj1BU6GbYVHmEdE6YQILqrnzqoXCREyyBCMMpIu1KwNss9rQmB0HqlPIaUCoULGAHjGqc0f
	zqPBm4TMOHJY650iEYMIutLQuH/Vt9HI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEyL+nqIVNCl3t7SBwlEGr6sCSBZgC4LWkZSEDB2boAgx6nxzDZN56Uc5r3JASafY20MmL9ZXOTQSXL1PPI1fI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a016:0:20b0:336:83d3:9210 with SMTP id
 38308e7fff4ca-33bb15ffba8mr8799191fa.22.1757227272559; Sat, 06 Sep 2025
 23:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20250829075557.598176-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> <20250829075557.598176-3-reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
 <CAOG64qN+BXH0S5YTzBrgY4JAJPd-TSDpiOd8YSirU=BA0hUy2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgrjW-yAOoXU5RJpAsbLiZdHbjJHNJqeEM1gMxF3ZkseRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgpOzC_VFH0O8KD_vWzFv27JFxbW13yOrfWj8zD5bbFNSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAADvAgpdFCbmFUu+jJSb1jzaw2tM4r76vEUtvhwo9nadk2RH8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOG64qOL4Wi_Nbq-gMYFKDSUdiqVyb2ZxN3tuiYQpt=JtmtpgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aL0ImQBGb3b4Md4y@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org> <CAADvAgouDoKp3_ZLyHMwcNtouzHcaSYq=QEdEKu9GK+q+zniBw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAADvAgouDoKp3_ZLyHMwcNtouzHcaSYq=QEdEKu9GK+q+zniBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ahmad Gani <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 13:40:35 +0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAADvAgpN3kmwreA7OkVVnUGnnMVsWnPVy2KxaHZu5WmPdhRo+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxKBu3gVYJ4YVAG54axkplmjvaKktSoQaEfROu0-epjKo81x6AyjHjzzU0
Message-ID: <CAADvAgpN3kmwreA7OkVVnUGnnMVsWnPVy2KxaHZu5WmPdhRo+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v8 2/2] gwproxy: refactor code base to add
 experimental raw DNS backend
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>, 
	"GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 1:39=E2=80=AFPM Ahmad Gani wrote:
> Is using a stack more advantageous than incrementing txid until it
> recycles itself? we can still keep track of unused indexes by checking
> if the session_map[txid] is NULL or not.

Oh wait, I think it's indeed more efficient to use stack rather than
checking for NULL, if the session_map is occupied in linear, the checking
may take longer to iterate until it finds NULL.