From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6248060F for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=purestorage.com header.i=@purestorage.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=Jo+jRyct; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id h5so6280505ejb.3 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=purestorage.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=OZtQcxDcF+QJnwZreYS90MKUZehnViyLLZnnAfp7iKs=; b=Jo+jRyct0JadtTzkSOhUx7jwb4EYB6forxbsGELDWVNkBd1q9xLcdkmTUn+j5y0lzz Y7vKb84KPkahFmZ/EETT5udumcw2fZN5sQuV9h3P0HESObG58G0PVVZtQjw+HuDlm8/R hbSpZxa/BrEAuzOF/uTE+3x4PBDG6PP0gDdIo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=OZtQcxDcF+QJnwZreYS90MKUZehnViyLLZnnAfp7iKs=; b=AuJh3Q7LDeHvyr9gghRccvJEL9O2oDwkPgXoGSRTBTlDYMV7036MA+H0lQ9rWROpFA 1Q+OvWcTtvbjgitSLYPPlCJAFWvhVWdWy0NxkSfsTA/GbrYu+g0rgoI6V3Qz3KxI/JN4 09ZDb+6zWJkxqaUBQP6CWDUu6adChX9zICPnOz21cnmziRThOZUAWJ8TQTJdItqI7TIx 5JmSAVCFRqNb23qK8uaMunO0Efll6P8A0+x0ZVoBeH2ecIBcO+gaqNTxMgtpXAz1Ib5J c/ahh5hXyyMYKzETQrek4eMxshuYdHyg5WimAKnSMSSx8giEtH2zKH3v61H6RyTJ4S6F Rg6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2IKVvEGnZL2SSC3Ll1llFexPywjaPFsmItk9ySqleqxi7riC8u wNuC0UApMgAtVjscg1E2lVseqLenlc9hoy6sBQKFxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7IIJCfR7Bw1y9Skcq/ysLsnHHHysKPUZQNxA+37xB2N1tL1nMt7iA++i2bDU2nDJNpzArXYHWJeu2COCEvdws= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7315:b0:741:5b1b:920d with SMTP id di21-20020a170906731500b007415b1b920dmr6989272ejc.484.1661802997838; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:56:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220829030521.3373516-1-ammar.faizi@intel.com> <20220829030521.3373516-4-ammar.faizi@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20220829030521.3373516-4-ammar.faizi@intel.com> From: Caleb Sander Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:56:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH liburing v1 3/4] man: Alias `io_uring_enter2()` to `io_uring_enter()` To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Jens Axboe , Muhammad Rizki , Kanna Scarlet , io-uring Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: There is no reference to "io_uring_enter2()" in this man page, only to the updated signature of "io_uring_enter()". Can we make it clearer that this is "io_uring_enter2()"? I would suggest adding the signature for io_uring_enter2() to the top of the man page and renaming "io_uring_enter()" to "io_uring_enter2()" in the "Since kernel 5.11" section. On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 8:08 PM Ammar Faizi wrote: > > From: Ammar Faizi > > We have a new function io_uring_enter2(), add the man page entry for it > by aliasing it to io_uring_enter(). This aliased man entry has already > explained it. > > Cc: Caleb Sander > Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi > --- > man/io_uring_enter2.2 | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > create mode 120000 man/io_uring_enter2.2 > > diff --git a/man/io_uring_enter2.2 b/man/io_uring_enter2.2 > new file mode 120000 > index 0000000..5566c09 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/man/io_uring_enter2.2 > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +io_uring_enter.2 > \ No newline at end of file > -- > Ammar Faizi >