From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server-vie001.gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=new2025; t=1754000441;
	bh=aBWSs2rw4YNTXlHyZEUNvAA/eVPmrBOAeS+fI4GRvJ0=;
	h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:
	 To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID:Date:From:
	 Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:
	 Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type:
	 Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=VAdGdmRl2TcTKhniyzvcEr1gb6fpNWufNCGjQa7DHiUiJpqmEgwVFDNE+YhnktK/u
	 oGgBhzm0ntdCVD9xY8RhRi9JUmqiq0JWmWPweQClJfgFPpmZ91BayGnEqjdaIVV2jJ
	 fA3QuIfoynFm76SyTdRpd8P+2lBWsYRnSS4jeXdhrXIdyyIwTImrpQtwKBhrSMc4n/
	 pgsAw2E1ZqzQN2wf4EkTeuKfXBfcYKz3E6OPSv6u+mKAM5XUbEwu5lWPPZXvYd1mNv
	 4dUmyMekzEP5XOWRhruxKL+S0sk1K3yuJwZFEbqpju7gZH9nf/McBgKJF/l/p/ukmI
	 wBQkD02aFdgdg==
Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53])
	by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1223126ED7
	for <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 22:20:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3137c20213cso1113079a91.3
        for <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YziNirquMyrYZNqP9ebXvJWuXVGbenhvj2wKHVKk4a+082hylR0
	fYwDzbupnxcycf3yJOpqPczlk0dH31903oc8ujVyQr1PIAFZBD5wIxbRCSzWlCtLSDV54xxQ53/
	3n/kSDI1CaPFsmcQ9Q05SmgHUUquEIyk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEHlWzPS0TJyh8zCwxmFx+dYYxPIMPCc3AraaztE+QmS8sXSrjutJIDqEMt9kpS15rdZCRiNu5RiE+yAfhI8Uo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3146:b0:31e:ff94:3fa0 with SMTP id
 98e67ed59e1d1-320fb7795fcmr687037a91.6.1754000440195; Thu, 31 Jul 2025
 15:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20250731220546.303497-1-alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
 <20250731220546.303497-2-alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org> <aIvrlj18CXH7aHq2@linux.gnuweeb.org>
In-Reply-To: <aIvrlj18CXH7aHq2@linux.gnuweeb.org>
From: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 05:20:27 +0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOG64qMSobK7bxhDt+_PVAae1wekfPgcLc1cBR6LtT+BXBaXdQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyqacOImC3_rRQvTTPc7bjOLQhRy8HXvbNDcjJheyug4lBjUMdMBhojHCg
Message-ID: <CAOG64qMSobK7bxhDt+_PVAae1wekfPgcLc1cBR6LtT+BXBaXdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v1 1/2] log: Fix missing `gettid()` syscall on
 older glibc version
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 5:18=E2=80=AFAM Ammar Faizi wrote:
> You can't use __do_syscall0() macro because it's only defined on
> x86-64. This breaks powerpc64 build and other architectures:
>
>   src/gwproxy/log.c: In function =E2=80=98__sys_gettid=E2=80=99:
>   src/gwproxy/log.c:13:23: warning: implicit declaration of function =E2=
=80=98__do_syscall0=E2=80=99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      13 |         return (pid_t)__do_syscall0(__NR_gettid);
>         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

ic ic, I wasn't aware of that. I will define __sys_gettid() in syscall.h th=
en.

-- Viro