From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=new2025; t=1754091144; bh=/V3M+5rJ9E1nLI0zai+fAa4TNXQoCRAHB7SDdrQbaFo=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID:Date:From: Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OD9nUZGmxKhvM7dcZ5DbWt9R+a7dbZlySim2C8h32V2epX+LwsBsetiCp9Sx2TFrG 1wwB1q25KY/dakrS89Yz15WHhSHjIU6B8/ECGQ4z/lBvHqTsJH7crj3wCju7hDrDzD L01nWcxs/ISzKKLUHD+ow5kdFW3OZuvLYjxJXyYTeVjcrmOIBq5IKaH57fwJbCV1Do WyluxZdEdvJIMdo2XYUQiZ5Z9VdQEFfSCwo/oBofQpmkOFni/xZDdib45xYX6m8Rc3 9UEIXMcIKNQeQYtIv/TEQBShTN7rsJdLjW2KTXy2DdJXqEZRRbDocJ8ZFNsf4AFlu5 KvmSOC1ttlbpw== Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0A0A3127AF7 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 23:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-31efc10bb03so1673825a91.0 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 16:32:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVoWhCVOOIJq07GbRxsS8er4a81rszUY2fmV9W8ExXAHD7uJoi/uEW+UCy/FmeMlKnLareO@vger.gnuweeb.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxzz4HwIpTUaKukhNqTCmnF0taNuq0/KtgZ6bo/8ZWgQ0Uc9Zof KqkEbq9VrvaCwihqkZu6G9J2EeWBLndEMNuRRXQkK6uUtMlKeL26GX61k6ElMkZq3bVJ0Vj2nF0 h9wGGILq3r7YopN13Fo0jS8qAbxubLXY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFoRNEAWXqT/8+Y0vEzABp0jjWTLCTugKmD1PnmgzEg772JAKmgcyOurBsh9Sy5AU/EUUC7aYaZnIH4VjyyDVQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b4e:b0:311:c596:5c6f with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3211629f31emr2330369a91.17.1754091142325; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 16:32:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250731030856.366368-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> <20250731030856.366368-4-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> In-Reply-To: From: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 06:32:11 +0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXy6lXaXccrnQY07jFNz1kztNxyl_jy3d8rL50y0x5VzezPCqsIO1Vp29yw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v1 3/3] dnslookup: Initial work for implementation of C-ares-like getaddrinfo function To: reyuki Cc: Ammar Faizi , "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 8:52=E2=80=AFAM reyuki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 2:15=E2=80=AFAM Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:09=E2=80=AFAM Ahmad Gani wrote: > > > +static int resolve_name(int sockfd, const char *name, uint16_t type,= uint16_t nport, > > > + struct gw_ares_addrinfo *result, struct gw_addrinfo_node **ta= il) > > > +{ > > > + uint8_t send_buff[UDP_MSG_LIMIT]; > > > + uint8_t recv_buff[UDP_MSG_LIMIT]; > > > + gwdns_query_pkt *query_pkt; > > > + gwdns_answ_data raw_answ; > > > + gwdns_question_part q; > > > + ssize_t buff_len; > > > + int ret; > > > [...] > > > +attempt_retry: > > > + ret =3D __sys_send(sockfd, send_buff, buff_len, MSG_NOSIGNAL)= ; > > > + if (ret < 0) { > > > + ret =3D GW_ARES_INTERNAL_ERR; > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (ret !=3D buff_len) > > > + goto attempt_retry; > > > > Why is this attempt_retry needed? > > Oh, do you mean short send is not possible in blocking socket? Sorry for > the confusion, I think I'm not aware of that fact. I will remove it. I didn't say that. I asked because I don't know. -- Viro