From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0795C80866 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Be2/2xom; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id m1so18676892edb.7 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:33:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=c1/+Ic+qs/Tguz67AE6aqGYV5ZtISD3Uy+OQ7Ht2f9g=; b=Be2/2xome7G5xjcOEAAvnJ2wWxc2GyBs/DcFPsQgdTXwJKWH3FL5Ghu6kcw1JjfuHN r2ubpdNA3jwonWvtO6zFAmpZJuNA7kVFpXWct7BbtmUA5Z7aGZSMkQW5zEbsQF3Qxpfv f5Qu2dWwQwV1O2aKf046/zaX3LnZ390A93XauC5VCmRVAi9bST3UY1A3Yopdi9qqAukB cQOCONO9VoK5UMehMSjIIflEHwD5GP+pY16pN396FPCtorSlCkr9iRdRiULoAgk1vCHn Elhr5CuPQVfxqZ4PEpgddyOvL9Iq6+XkIUzFiXadunGq7N5pXL89wGUCtbykFVfspk/V jYHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=c1/+Ic+qs/Tguz67AE6aqGYV5ZtISD3Uy+OQ7Ht2f9g=; b=GOAZFIfq5a2Z7u6D5VVUxwuRaLXbMZuqXEiTZXmKa+SLKHZiSFkLTpQXHX0c4Jrxi+ /qGIpiKwcO9StyqP32/HWuUpPjluJHYBEZS58TjaGPSr+U7Pwywmi4aRuMwMmb8FBibM iso8k1gL2vnUvlUSRlg+7uFAUzkhBuXj/Ln6HhZdzqk8g6bsj6exerQOy6zCMDLPTexh 7iMvCvR7xJnok4jOuyeTdYml0MY8UuW42GnOJmyZrwNbFSRih1etuSX40KcO2BsVhoY2 k5jXlTQz8+tXPTKXz9rgswN+T8t449NzEkd1akwRJe/4Tsf7AIq3MdSyedvhm4kwWsif 9RwA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2HgbivWoQhdiY4HTeIG6dq+LjGazn+0S/fPwe7WbPnTEXQmLk3 NlcyAiMBZlWJ7zV8McemAiT7SjLsPApaljYpa+U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4iC8n4oo0pshF1riom0/biPk8VnpKWsOuOJe9nsdBPl52JPc8Bg4ueUfmbvIDCK7TKQbveRZ3rAaZgpLGU+m8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:50cb:b0:440:87d4:3ad2 with SMTP id h11-20020a05640250cb00b0044087d43ad2mr24783726edb.219.1661956380302; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:33:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <291c272c-f3c6-6479-1b00-bf8c57ec9cf6@gnuweeb.org> <6827c274-5a85-aa8f-b41f-ccf520d7aad6@torproject.org> <1f42f7e1-8691-5b15-36c3-a7470294867c@gnuweeb.org> <903389a3-1c36-4bf3-cb30-7c12cb9b98ed@gnuweeb.org> <2aba6c4e-04c9-3e66-1293-583e68d8307d@torproject.org> <0238b664-2822-7db1-da0e-3f4424737b51@torproject.org> <6e0c8443-8e10-2b2c-6401-39d72f8d4455@gnuweeb.org> <50a99217-06d5-6404-9e5a-070dd1777d14@torproject.org> <8139f3ff-0f6e-b363-dda8-f5a8f4265732@gnuweeb.org> <06aeec7d-e8b5-ef6b-a6f9-60b0f9bcc36e@torproject.org> <736c22b0-bfd8-4bb1-74b5-de376ca67e35@gnuweeb.org> <1509780b-1ff1-3a87-bb65-f764d11c1f42@gnuweeb.org> In-Reply-To: <1509780b-1ff1-3a87-bb65-f764d11c1f42@gnuweeb.org> From: Louvian Lyndal Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:32:48 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Your TeaInside relay is failing to relay exit traffic To: Ammar Faizi Cc: Georg Koppen , bad-relays , "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: On 8/31/22 9:07 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote: > On 8/31/22 9:02 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote: >> On 8/31/22 8:37 PM, Georg Koppen wrote: >>> Ammar Faizi: >>>> On 8/31/22 2:25 PM, Georg Koppen wrote: >>>> Current usage: >>>> >>>> - A single small scrapper app (SOCKSPort). >>>> >>>> I configure many ports to get many exit IP addresses for >>>> randomizing my identity. >>> >>> How is that supposed to work given that you only have one exit IP address >>> (68.183.184.174)? >> >> You misunderstood my email. >> >> I use the SOCKSPort for scraping, this gives me random exit IP. It doesn't >> use my exit IP for the scraper's outbound traffic. A simple way to use it >> is like this (I expose the ports publicly, you can try it too): >> >> ```bash >> >> for i in {64500..64599}; do >> curl -4 https://ipecho.net/plain --proxy socks5://68.183.184.174:$i; echo; >> done; >> >> ``` >> >> It's slow, but it works. >> >>> And what are you actually scraping? >> >> The current is actively fetching https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/new.atom >> every 30 seconds. I don't see this as a big deal for the Tor network anyway. > > Just addition to that, previously, Louvian (in the CC) was scraping nhentai.net > with those SOCKSPort(s). But it was not a massive traffic. I've stopped scraping it for a while, sometimes only running the scraper when I want to download a specific gallery number from nh. but yes, before it, the scraper was running a bit aggressively for content collecting purpose I'll stop doing that, I actually enjoy reading nh online more than downloading. Our scraping activity (on nh) didn't actually have a strong intention, it was just for fun collecting data and happy doing code. thanks, lvldll