public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yusuf Hadiwinata <[email protected]>
To: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>, Support <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Rafli Arkan <[email protected]>,
	Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	Paber Panjaitan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [## 385523 ##] Disk I/O di Neo Lite kembali bermasalah
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:06:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <KL1PR06MB6670A3EF38441C894B3AF19BB6A62@KL1PR06MB6670.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10136 bytes --]

Dear Ammar dan Team


Kita mau analisa beberapa suspect di Host yang terdapat instance yang di laporkan, boleh kita move instance nya ? Akan ada downtime estimas < 5 menit jika berkenan
Kalo ada preferensi waktu boleh di info juga kira2 enak nya jam berapaan


Thanks






________________________________
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 12 July 2024 19:42
To: Support <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Rafli Arkan <[email protected]>; Yusuf Hadiwinata <[email protected]>; Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>; GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>; Paber Panjaitan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [## 385523 ##] Disk I/O di Neo Lite kembali bermasalah

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:23:09AM -0700, Ammar Rafli wrote:
>  Silakan untuk melampirkan capture hasil fio nya pada ticket ini agar kami dapat melihat me-review detail IOPS nya ya Pak.

Saya lampirkan output fio berikut:

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=read --filename=/root/fio --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
fio: engine libaio not loadable
fio: failed to load engine

# Note: libaio tidak available, saya ubah ke io_uring.

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=read --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 2 (f=2): [_(2),R(2)][34.3%][r=5853KiB/s][r=731 IOPS][eta 01m:59s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18651: Fri Jul 12 19:25:53 2024
  read: IOPS=1001, BW=8013KiB/s (8205kB/s)(477MiB/60951msec)
   bw (  KiB/s): min=   96, max=20864, per=100.00%, avg=8536.02, stdev=1493.19, samples=385
   iops        : min=   12, max= 2608, avg=1066.99, stdev=186.65, samples=385
  cpu          : usr=0.11%, sys=0.25%, ctx=70031, majf=0, minf=2066
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
     issued rwts: total=61048,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=8013KiB/s (8205kB/s), 8013KiB/s-8013KiB/s (8205kB/s-8205kB/s), io=477MiB (500MB), run=60951-60951msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=60990/53, sectors=976152/528, merge=0/10, ticks=55711072/42055, in_queue=55753611, util=99.96%

=============================================================================================================

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=rw --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=50 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [M(4)][100.0%][r=8032KiB/s,w=8104KiB/s][r=1004,w=1013 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18664: Fri Jul 12 19:31:16 2024
  read: IOPS=994, BW=7959KiB/s (8150kB/s)(471MiB/60624msec)
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  448, max=21488, per=99.84%, avg=7947.47, stdev=1237.33, samples=481
   iops        : min=   56, max= 2686, avg=993.41, stdev=154.67, samples=481
  write: IOPS=1001, BW=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s)(474MiB/60624msec); 0 zone resets
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  416, max=21520, per=99.71%, avg=7987.95, stdev=1227.20, samples=481
   iops        : min=   52, max= 2690, avg=998.47, stdev=153.40, samples=481
  cpu          : usr=0.20%, sys=0.46%, ctx=96868, majf=0, minf=26
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
     issued rwts: total=60316,60700,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=7959KiB/s (8150kB/s), 7959KiB/s-7959KiB/s (8150kB/s-8150kB/s), io=471MiB (494MB), run=60624-60624msec
  WRITE: bw=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s), 8010KiB/s-8010KiB/s (8202kB/s-8202kB/s), io=474MiB (497MB), run=60624-60624msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=60146/60471, sectors=962336/967448, merge=0/12, ticks=27376373/30599469, in_queue=57977062, util=99.97%


=============================================================================================================

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randread --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=100 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 2 (f=2): [r(1),_(1),r(1),_(1)][34.3%][r=5904KiB/s][r=738 IOPS][eta 01m:59s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18673: Fri Jul 12 19:35:08 2024
  read: IOPS=1001, BW=8013KiB/s (8206kB/s)(478MiB/61139msec)
   bw (  KiB/s): min= 1824, max=18288, per=100.00%, avg=8101.39, stdev=1076.94, samples=445
   iops        : min=  228, max= 2286, avg=1012.67, stdev=134.62, samples=445
  cpu          : usr=0.12%, sys=0.26%, ctx=71964, majf=0, minf=2076
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
     issued rwts: total=61240,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=8013KiB/s (8206kB/s), 8013KiB/s-8013KiB/s (8206kB/s-8206kB/s), io=478MiB (502MB), run=61139-61139msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=61240/7, sectors=980080/112, merge=0/7, ticks=61595911/6429, in_queue=61602360, util=99.95%

=============================================================================================================

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randwrite --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [w(4)][3.5%][w=1936KiB/s][w=242 IOPS][eta 28m:31s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18683: Fri Jul 12 19:37:33 2024
  write: IOPS=1001, BW=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s)(478MiB/61102msec); 0 zone resets
   bw (  KiB/s): min=   96, max=27984, per=100.00%, avg=8245.91, stdev=1833.66, samples=465
   iops        : min=   12, max= 3498, avg=1030.70, stdev=229.20, samples=465
  cpu          : usr=0.13%, sys=0.27%, ctx=44021, majf=0, minf=28
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
     issued rwts: total=0,61176,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s), 8010KiB/s-8010KiB/s (8202kB/s-8202kB/s), io=478MiB (501MB), run=61102-61102msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=0/60981, sectors=0/975608, merge=0/11, ticks=0/52000246, in_queue=52001504, util=99.95%

=============================================================================================================

root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randrw --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=0 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [w(4)][100.0%][w=6904KiB/s][w=863 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18693: Fri Jul 12 19:39:00 2024
  write: IOPS=1001, BW=8009KiB/s (8201kB/s)(476MiB/60853msec); 0 zone resets
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  256, max=24624, per=100.00%, avg=8209.34, stdev=1657.90, samples=470
   iops        : min=   32, max= 3078, avg=1026.15, stdev=207.24, samples=470
  cpu          : usr=0.15%, sys=0.31%, ctx=49963, majf=0, minf=28
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
     issued rwts: total=0,60920,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=8009KiB/s (8201kB/s), 8009KiB/s-8009KiB/s (8201kB/s-8201kB/s), io=476MiB (499MB), run=60853-60853msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=0/60744, sectors=0/971808, merge=0/12, ticks=0/56919694, in_queue=56920300, util=99.97%

=============================================================================================================

--
Ammar Faizi

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 15312 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-12 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-12 11:12 Disk I/O di Neo Lite kembali bermasalah Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:27 ` Re:[## 385523 ##] " Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 11:34   ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:40     ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 11:47       ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:57         ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:09           ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 12:20             ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:23               ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:42                 ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:00                   ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 13:19                     ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:06                   ` Yusuf Hadiwinata [this message]
2024-07-12 13:12                     ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:13                       ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:20                         ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:21                           ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:31                             ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:40                               ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 14:12                                 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 14:45                               ` [## " Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:12                     ` Ammar Faizi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=KL1PR06MB6670A3EF38441C894B3AF19BB6A62@KL1PR06MB6670.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox