From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.2.41.146]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 147FF831E1; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:02:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1677492135; bh=HzfaCigHgb6Z+xfz7yIVdSy7DWhZopcyQEu9jCZDWj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RhBkp7VEtWPoK/PZd9ql0NDUOC7uzxI8gtfSNzEUA7JG1Q1mfl7OLm5XLfeOdV/q2 OIhf/QVM6ovsRRkmjbSzI1WfGZfD8Q3PZOtOvDQnMG/sdP0Mol3/WbXl+jvN5Hf6TV 2JwHAEEiQTTMn+tcJthImnGPAAleyRCJ/F5/xV0+FTL/L/9r2btIG2T0tRQqevLyRF d2H55qp3owPxxUpgp8xaiWAbYvJQnL5YDXFYOPDP7hV2ZTEF8/AmHYGFmKG4SYkMzd lw+2VjqgyTjMuYZjluupyl8kBFMQsa8w/mZFGi6CeZrv0sayj8DKk0S7iSgKMZu+VI 2SyXzIFqqXOdQ== Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:02:08 +0700 From: Ammar Faizi To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Filipe Manana , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Btrfs Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fsdevel Mailing List , GNU/Weeb Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: btrfs: Document the influence of wq_cpu_set to thread_pool option Message-ID: References: <20230226162639.20559-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> <20230226162639.20559-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bpl: hUx9VaHkTWcLO7S8CQCslj6OzqBx2hfLChRz45nPESx5VSB/xuJQVOKOB1zSXE3yc9ntP27bV1M1 List-Id: On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:15:58AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Why will the behavior be introduced in such future version (6.5)? It's not like it has been staged for the next merge window. It's still in an RFC state. The changes are not trivial and need further review. I don't know if it can hit the next merge window. As such, I picked a long distance for this proposal. If it ends up going upstream sooner, we can change this document. -- Ammar Faizi