public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
To: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>,
	Dave Hansen <[email protected]>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
	Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,
	Tony Luck <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in `delay_loop()`
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:26:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh3YyU2VVK/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 02:32:22PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> The asm constraint does not reflect that the asm statement can modify
> the value of @loops. But the asm statement in delay_loop() does change
> the @loops.
> 
> If by any chance the compiler inlines this function, it may clobber
> random stuff (e.g. local variable, important temporary value in reg,
> etc.).
> 
> Fortunately, delay_loop() is only called indirectly (so it can't
> inline), and then the register it clobbers is %rax (which is by the
> nature of the calling convention, it's a caller saved register), so it
> didn't yield any bug.
> 
> ^ That shouldn't be an excuse for using the wrong constraint anyway.
> 
> This changes "a" (as an input) to "+a" (as an input and output).
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
> Fixes: e01b70ef3eb3080fecc35e15f68cd274c0a48163 ("x86: fix bug in arch/i386/lib/delay.c file, delay_loop function")

You only need 12 characters here :)

> Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
> ---

Why is this one not tagged for stable?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01  7:32 [PATCH 0/2] Two x86 fixes Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/delay: Fix the wrong asm constraint in `delay_loop()` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01  8:26   ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-03-01  8:46     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-01  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mce/amd: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails Ammar Faizi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh3YyU2VVK/[email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox