From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/17] fs: Split off remove_needs_file_privs() __remove_file_privs()
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 00:32:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
So why don't we just define a __file_remove_privs that gets the iocb
flags passed an an extra argument, and then make file_remove_privs pass
0 flags, and maybe also add a kiocb_remove_privs wrapper for callers
that have the kiocb. Same for the timestamp update, btw. That seems
less churn and less code overall.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-22 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 18:36 [RFC PATCH v4 00/17] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/17] mm: Move starting of background writeback into the main balancing loop Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/17] mm: Move updates of dirty_exceeded into one place Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/17] mm: Prepare balance_dirty_pages() for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/17] mm: Add balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() function Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/17] iomap: Add gfp parameter to iomap_page_create() Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/17] iomap: Add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/17] iomap: Use balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags in iomap_write_iter Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/17] fs: Add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/17] fs: Split off remove_needs_file_privs() __remove_file_privs() Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/17] fs: Split off file_needs_update_time and __file_update_time Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/17] fs: Add async write file modification handling Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/17] fs: Optimization for concurrent file time updates Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/17] io_uring: Add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/17] io_uring: Add tracepoint for short writes Stefan Roesch
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/17] xfs: Add iomap async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/17] xfs: Add " Stefan Roesch
2022-05-22 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/17] xfs: Enable " Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox