From: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
To: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>,
Aarushi Mehta <[email protected]>,
Julia Suvorova <[email protected]>, Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>,
Hanna Reitz <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
Filipe Manana <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix short read slow path
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:28:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsQ8aM3/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2007 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:52:31AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
> > > so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads, making sure we go
> > > through the two short reads path.
> > > (Unfortunately I wasn't quite sure what to fiddle with to issue short
> > > reads in the first place, I tried cutting one of the iovs short in
> > > luring_do_submit() but I must not have been doing it properly as I ended
> > > up with 0 return values which are handled by filling in with 0 (reads
> > > after eof) and that didn't work well)
> >
> > Do you remember the kernel version where you first saw these problems?
>
> Since you're quoting my paragraph about testing two short reads, I've
> never seen any that I know of; but there's also no reason these couldn't
> happen.
>
> Single short reads have been happening for me with O_DIRECT (cache=none)
> on btrfs for a while, but unfortunately I cannot remember which was the
> first kernel I've seen this on -- I think rather than a kernel update it
> was due to file manipulations that made the file eligible for short
> reads in the first place (I started running deduplication on the backing
> file)
>
> The older kernel I have installed right now is 5.16 and that can
> reproduce it -- I'll give my laptop some work over the weekend to test
> still maintained stable branches if that's useful.
Hi Dominique,
Linux 5.16 contains commit 9d93a3f5a0c ("io_uring: punt short reads to
async context"). The comment above QEMU's luring_resubmit_short_read()
claims that short reads are a bug that was fixed by Linux commit
9d93a3f5a0c.
If the comment is inaccurate it needs to be fixed. Maybe short writes
need to be handled too.
I have CCed Jens and the io_uring mailing list to clarify:
1. Are short IORING_OP_READV reads possible on files/block devices?
2. Are short IORING_OP_WRITEV writes possible on files/block devices?
Thanks,
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <[email protected]>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YsQ8aM3/[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox