From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1741232137; bh=uoIJFWfQm0XXBPP8JVcL6jaYxM3U75nMPYcjpuSMViI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To: Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HJFvIUimTc1hyESFhxgQ6JL16Bgfy985XxxfTqvCmsPXZCUcFdrXemJ7uLXcz07iW i4Sbuw1I1uDjCvs7JZPcPYhkwt6Cp5c6z+nR2AOz/magVsdPqzRIBrltK50XxLFRH7 kzQnhaEI4nklwzYrK1DAOodcs8o6Xk71NvpwTszfCV07XSWEcN17oFA8UtIn6psvwf 5ujwxdlFNTZRZabqp1zoPqyj+5knMejTvnonWRBiPqNoBVpYMHFgmpgK/bwGe0GyK7 SFDw1UqZ0ewovyfrSFY3rYV3Fi2VyI3hoBSnldxHuTL2Hnc3hWFNl+/Rz7BZA05MM8 /p7kHzP4yEbtA== Received: from biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.253.126.121]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFA6420B4831; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 03:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:35:28 +0900 From: Ammar Faizi To: Muhammad Rizki Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/17] Profile Page, SEO, Fixed API structure, Docs Message-ID: References: <20250305144018.267-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:59:57AM +0700, Muhammad Rizki wrote: > On 06/03/2025 01:14, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote: > > btw, social media fields can't be left empty now. They should be nullable > > > > -- Viro > > I created them as optional, but the API returns error field when one of > them is empty. Actually, no. You left the fields missing, not empty. You still need to send empty fields of socials[xxx]. Try the old version for comparison. -- Ammar Faizi