From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
To: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
Cc: "Alviro Iskandar Setiawan" <[email protected]>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <[email protected]>,
"David Laight" <[email protected]>,
"Nicholas Rosenberg" <[email protected]>,
"Michael William Jonathan" <[email protected]>,
"GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <[email protected]>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Use `rep stosb` for `memset()`
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 11:55:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 03:39:33PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> [ Resend, I sent it using the wrong From address. ]
>
> On 2023/09/03 ??3:17, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 02:34:22AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 02:28:18AM +0700, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
> > > > nit: Be consistent. Use \n\t for the memset too.
> > >
> > > Good catch, I'll fix that in v4 revision.
> >
> > Ammar, I'm overall fine with your series. I can as well add the missing \t
> > to your patch while merging it, or wait for your v4, just let me know.
>
> I'm now traveling and will be available in Jakarta on Monday. Thus, I
> actually planned to send the v4 revision on Monday.
>
> However, since you don't have further objections to this series, I'll
> leave the trivial missing bit to you. Please merge this series and I
> will not send a v4 revision.
OK now merged with the \t appended. No need to spend your time on a v4
anymore.
Thanks!
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-03 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-02 13:35 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] nolibc x86-64 string functions Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Use `rep movsb` for `memcpy()` and `memmove()` Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Use `rep stosb` for `memset()` Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 19:28 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2023-09-02 19:34 ` Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 19:38 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2023-09-02 19:39 ` Ammar Faizi
2023-09-03 8:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-03 8:34 ` Ammar Nofan Faizi
2023-09-03 8:39 ` Ammar Faizi
2023-09-03 9:55 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-09-02 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] tools/nolibc: string: Remove the `_nolibc_memcpy_down()` function Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 19:24 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2023-09-02 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] tools/nolibc: string: Remove the `_nolibc_memcpy_up()` function Ammar Faizi
2023-09-02 19:26 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2023-09-03 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] nolibc x86-64 string functions David Laight
2023-09-03 21:19 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox