From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Authentication-Results: gnuweeb.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=163.172.96.212; helo=1wt.eu; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; receiver= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B001249B0A for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:21:52 +0700 (WIB) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 39R8LPmd006553; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:21:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:21:25 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH nolibc 0/19] Updates to nolibc for v6.7 (and three for v6.6) Message-ID: References: <20231026180917.198491-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231026180917.198491-1-falcon@tinylab.org> List-Id: [CCed Thomas] Hi Zhangjin, On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:09:17AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > [out-of-tree] > > [ Sorry, please ignore the last one with lwt.eu, it should be 1wt.eu, seems a typo: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b34ce3cf-3fcc-4eb0-a658-229c197455ef@paulmck-laptop/ ] Ah, indeed! > Hi, Paul, Thomas and Willy > > I just learned our nolibc tree has been moved to another git repo and > have seen this PR series. I was waiting for a new branch in Willy's repo ;-) Yes, we also updated the MAINTAINERS file with it, now that the nolibc family grows :-) I'll eventually remove my repo. > Just a question: seems some patches of mine have been queued to Willy's > local repo, but I haven't seen in this PR, I can't remember which ones > are queued exactly, here may be at least one of them: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/cover.1691783604.git.falcon@tinylab.org/ Which one do you mean ? The one I'm seeing there in the discussion mentions patch 3 ("use HOSTCC instead of CC") and I find it merged already (commit 418c84682). > Or do I need to send a new series for them? some of the commit message issues > have been changed by Willy manually, so, that series online can not be merged > simply, If necessary, I'm ok to resend them. It's possible that something fell through the cracks, I've had a very difficult experience of the many parallel discussion threads in the past, but I can't guess what you find missing, so please be more specific about these (or possibly resend them if you want), I'd just prefer to avoid re-reviewing something already reviewed. Thanks! Willy