From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Biznet Gio Support <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Rafli Arkan <[email protected]>,
Yusuf Hadiwinata <[email protected]>,
Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>,
Paber Panjaitan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [## 385523 ##] Disk I/O di Neo Lite kembali bermasalah
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:42:03 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edbsn50f53c17f496b434b8575782d4d1c96d429946ea2cf7b43ce9194b65a05cf700_s413x_190a6e5b1fc@zohodesk.com>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:23:09AM -0700, Ammar Rafli wrote:
> Silakan untuk melampirkan capture hasil fio nya pada ticket ini agar kami dapat melihat me-review detail IOPS nya ya Pak.
Saya lampirkan output fio berikut:
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=read --filename=/root/fio --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
fio: engine libaio not loadable
fio: failed to load engine
# Note: libaio tidak available, saya ubah ke io_uring.
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=read --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 2 (f=2): [_(2),R(2)][34.3%][r=5853KiB/s][r=731 IOPS][eta 01m:59s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18651: Fri Jul 12 19:25:53 2024
read: IOPS=1001, BW=8013KiB/s (8205kB/s)(477MiB/60951msec)
bw ( KiB/s): min= 96, max=20864, per=100.00%, avg=8536.02, stdev=1493.19, samples=385
iops : min= 12, max= 2608, avg=1066.99, stdev=186.65, samples=385
cpu : usr=0.11%, sys=0.25%, ctx=70031, majf=0, minf=2066
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=61048,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=8013KiB/s (8205kB/s), 8013KiB/s-8013KiB/s (8205kB/s-8205kB/s), io=477MiB (500MB), run=60951-60951msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=60990/53, sectors=976152/528, merge=0/10, ticks=55711072/42055, in_queue=55753611, util=99.96%
=============================================================================================================
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=rw --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=50 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [M(4)][100.0%][r=8032KiB/s,w=8104KiB/s][r=1004,w=1013 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18664: Fri Jul 12 19:31:16 2024
read: IOPS=994, BW=7959KiB/s (8150kB/s)(471MiB/60624msec)
bw ( KiB/s): min= 448, max=21488, per=99.84%, avg=7947.47, stdev=1237.33, samples=481
iops : min= 56, max= 2686, avg=993.41, stdev=154.67, samples=481
write: IOPS=1001, BW=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s)(474MiB/60624msec); 0 zone resets
bw ( KiB/s): min= 416, max=21520, per=99.71%, avg=7987.95, stdev=1227.20, samples=481
iops : min= 52, max= 2690, avg=998.47, stdev=153.40, samples=481
cpu : usr=0.20%, sys=0.46%, ctx=96868, majf=0, minf=26
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=60316,60700,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=7959KiB/s (8150kB/s), 7959KiB/s-7959KiB/s (8150kB/s-8150kB/s), io=471MiB (494MB), run=60624-60624msec
WRITE: bw=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s), 8010KiB/s-8010KiB/s (8202kB/s-8202kB/s), io=474MiB (497MB), run=60624-60624msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=60146/60471, sectors=962336/967448, merge=0/12, ticks=27376373/30599469, in_queue=57977062, util=99.97%
=============================================================================================================
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randread --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=100 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 2 (f=2): [r(1),_(1),r(1),_(1)][34.3%][r=5904KiB/s][r=738 IOPS][eta 01m:59s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18673: Fri Jul 12 19:35:08 2024
read: IOPS=1001, BW=8013KiB/s (8206kB/s)(478MiB/61139msec)
bw ( KiB/s): min= 1824, max=18288, per=100.00%, avg=8101.39, stdev=1076.94, samples=445
iops : min= 228, max= 2286, avg=1012.67, stdev=134.62, samples=445
cpu : usr=0.12%, sys=0.26%, ctx=71964, majf=0, minf=2076
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=61240,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=8013KiB/s (8206kB/s), 8013KiB/s-8013KiB/s (8206kB/s-8206kB/s), io=478MiB (502MB), run=61139-61139msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=61240/7, sectors=980080/112, merge=0/7, ticks=61595911/6429, in_queue=61602360, util=99.95%
=============================================================================================================
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randwrite --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=75 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [w(4)][3.5%][w=1936KiB/s][w=242 IOPS][eta 28m:31s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18683: Fri Jul 12 19:37:33 2024
write: IOPS=1001, BW=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s)(478MiB/61102msec); 0 zone resets
bw ( KiB/s): min= 96, max=27984, per=100.00%, avg=8245.91, stdev=1833.66, samples=465
iops : min= 12, max= 3498, avg=1030.70, stdev=229.20, samples=465
cpu : usr=0.13%, sys=0.27%, ctx=44021, majf=0, minf=28
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=0,61176,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=8010KiB/s (8202kB/s), 8010KiB/s-8010KiB/s (8202kB/s-8202kB/s), io=478MiB (501MB), run=61102-61102msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=0/60981, sectors=0/975608, merge=0/11, ticks=0/52000246, in_queue=52001504, util=99.95%
=============================================================================================================
root@wjv001:~/fio# ./fio --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --rw=randrw --filename=./test --bs=8k --iodepth=256 --size=2Gb --runtime=60 --numjobs=4 --time_based --rwmixread=0 --group_reporting
test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 8192B-8192B, (W) 8192B-8192B, (T) 8192B-8192B, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=256
...
fio-3.37-60-g6eaa64
Starting 4 processes
Jobs: 4 (f=4): [w(4)][100.0%][w=6904KiB/s][w=863 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=18693: Fri Jul 12 19:39:00 2024
write: IOPS=1001, BW=8009KiB/s (8201kB/s)(476MiB/60853msec); 0 zone resets
bw ( KiB/s): min= 256, max=24624, per=100.00%, avg=8209.34, stdev=1657.90, samples=470
iops : min= 32, max= 3078, avg=1026.15, stdev=207.24, samples=470
cpu : usr=0.15%, sys=0.31%, ctx=49963, majf=0, minf=28
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.6%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=0,60920,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=256
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=8009KiB/s (8201kB/s), 8009KiB/s-8009KiB/s (8201kB/s-8201kB/s), io=476MiB (499MB), run=60853-60853msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=0/60744, sectors=0/971808, merge=0/12, ticks=0/56919694, in_queue=56920300, util=99.97%
=============================================================================================================
--
Ammar Faizi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-12 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 11:12 Disk I/O di Neo Lite kembali bermasalah Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:27 ` Re:[## 385523 ##] " Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 11:34 ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:40 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 11:47 ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 11:57 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:09 ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 12:20 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:23 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 12:42 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2024-07-12 13:00 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 13:19 ` [## " Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:06 ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:12 ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:13 ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:20 ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:21 ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 13:31 ` Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:40 ` Ammar Faizi
2024-07-12 14:12 ` Ammar Rafli
2024-07-12 14:45 ` [## " Yusuf Hadiwinata
2024-07-12 13:12 ` Ammar Faizi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox