From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server-vie001.gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=new2025; t=1754389590;
	bh=w8Mg+S7xXRE62N+As7FSO0ScPhk6rsCtXDFdDEgiOjM=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:
	 Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:
	 Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=GZ3gYukRxHIpFvziHrVyRZ8cHqPijyC6I3sB/uJnoV49KDyDFe7iAj0j+zpSOKVs2
	 0IxwbjO4Bxa5f0Xi7uV2srj6e/uCU6XtRcuAx3TRF1P1tQp4Edx9IfQQfR8GUkGKur
	 fa+5tMgFSftWxDu+QFQhzW0Mz9jd/4bmQkG+ZCh/7PZYJK5YSWU/yZMYXzwmu/ah+2
	 WtNLfN7eALO/3ia4T9Qwxh8d1FKQRhtFqXqJULFEMOSdsnUfT+Fwptl9iLwfzy09Wq
	 PbvHR/DftLArMPfOv4RsJPlnOSyCC4xzp0sSsM6QYOckLAZq+qvOcApdqJZbWx2DlE
	 1K1b2656ubBGw==
Received: from linux.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.253.126.229])
	by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B715312804C;
	Tue,  5 Aug 2025 10:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:26:26 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To: reyuki <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
	GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v3 2/9] dnslookup: Add a new parameter,
 default_port.
Message-ID: <aJHcUpSCiSgz6iLj@linux.gnuweeb.org>
References: <20250805064933.109080-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
 <20250805064933.109080-3-reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
 <aJHOS/IXBSQeFhDr@linux.gnuweeb.org>
 <CAADvAgq4iqmdABKgZedeL4vPUej=yLd3dYH_ECeSkn2CqNt1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAADvAgq4iqmdABKgZedeL4vPUej=yLd3dYH_ECeSkn2CqNt1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Machine-Hash: hUx9VaHkTWcLO7S8CQCslj6OzqBx2hfLChRz45nPESx5VSB/xuJQVOKOB1zSXE3yc9ntP27bV1M1
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>


[ Please fix your name on the MUA. No pseudonyms or anonymous actors here. ]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 05:15:46PM +0700, reyuki wrote:
> In the previous message, you mentioned that the new parameter should be
> separated from patch 1/9. Is it okay if I pick the commit for patch 1/9
> during git rebase, edit it to remove prt, and preserve patch 2/9 as it is?

You can do the former, but you can't do the latter because patch #2
depends on that `prt` change, which will not exist if you omit the `prt`
addtion in patch #1. So it won't apply, in rebase progress that will
conflict, obviously.

You can just create a new patch only adding default_port instead of
preserving patch #2.

-- 
Ammar Faizi