From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server-vie001.gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=new2025; t=1754451912; bh=steqPbpVnGEgcxIWz3gKpTi3ss1FsuXOANlV08plNyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To: Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:User-Agent:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LI3m86iuVHt6rYaU9hDr7R4VSbYZBs/5YRYAGIAJvz2O2e/UsC9OdY+Kz8O9bqN8Q Hyes0v47xLFlj1T2haGkWIryg4YuJ7iqdC5R7pU4hSnoOKQdwalCg7GH7QHbnFjdy8 A0dW0+/aQm0Wya8A3dAKSm/IvPrt4qY+2E7+IjmGuGUY3rJtko3lnxh15JBO04vvb5 j3q618T/SewWGUzKRFMzg5MCEqPAfytdt8nNzKfg/cYoB2YBRaCJbCyYIFIM2uJkTb 4Icd3fIqUz0MidQn5yMgY5AkG0mphEZUFkV4ZLg9An9BP/Ix/jqQ522jGXxvW+FxrU xnl3qP4NJPH4Q== Received: from linux.gnuweeb.org (unknown [182.253.126.229]) by server-vie001.gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8AA83127C38; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 03:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 10:45:08 +0700 From: Ammar Faizi To: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan Cc: Ahmad Gani , GNU/Weeb Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v3 0/6] Initial work for DNS lookup implementation Message-ID: References: <20250805124042.143673-1-reyuki@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Machine-Hash: hUx9VaHkTWcLO7S8CQCslj6OzqBx2hfLChRz45nPESx5VSB/xuJQVOKOB1zSXE3yc9ntP27bV1M1 List-Id: On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 10:39:07AM +0700, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote: > Don't send a v3 patchset again, this has been sent 3 times. It's very > confusing to follow. I've archived the whole series. I'm not going to > read this improper patchset. It should be incrementing version v1, v2, > v3, v4, v5, ... Yes, I have told him about it yesterday. I expect it's the last mistake that wasted people's time and energy rechecking 'Date' header to ensure the correct order from the same subject. Very confusing, indeed. The next series should be a v4. -- Ammar Faizi